Magazine

Playing Outdoors Better for Children than Screens

By Syd­ney Gagnon | UConn Jour­nal­ism
Decem­ber 5, 2023

hands on a computer keyboard
A boy using a lap­top at school. (AP File Photo/Karel Navar­ro)

Mar­i­anne Juber enjoys dri­ving her grand­son to school. Her grand­son, 5, has a love for knowl­edge and reads at a fourth-grade lev­el. When an advanced math inter­ven­tion­ist taught him how to play Yahtzee at school, his father bought him the game for home. Her grand­son would play the game all day, but begged for his iPad once play­time was over.

His father offered the iPad to his son, but only if Yahtzee was returned to the store. The grand­son, who instant­ly agreed to the bar­gain, cried after­ward and regret­ted his deci­sion. Notic­ing the pow­er the iPad had on his son, which was giv­en to him dur­ing the pan­dem­ic so he could use the ear­ly edu­ca­tion pro­gram ABC­mouse, Juber’s son regrets ever intro­duc­ing the device into his home.

Juber, an east­ern Con­necti­cut teacher of 38 years, not only noticed how much screen time has changed the way her grand­son spends his time, but the way chil­dren are grow­ing up in gen­er­al.

“I see such neg­a­tive effects through­out because of it,” Juber said.

As tech­nol­o­gy con­tin­ues to become inte­grat­ed into the lives of fam­i­lies, chil­dren are spend­ing more recre­ation­al time on elec­tron­ic devices. With stream­ing ser­vices and games acces­si­ble with the touch of a but­ton, chil­dren are choos­ing screen time over oth­er forms of play. Screen time is replac­ing time that, before the dig­i­tal age, would be used for more unstruc­tured and imag­i­na­tive play.

Because chil­dren are spend­ing more time indoors on their devices, chil­dren are spend­ing less time out­doors, for exam­ple, where the imag­i­na­tion can lit­er­al­ly run wild. Dr. Kris­ten Kling, a psy­chol­o­gy pro­fes­sor at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Con­necti­cut, believes out­door play is impor­tant for chil­dren because it allows more time for cre­ativ­i­ty in an unsu­per­vised envi­ron­ment. Out­door play requires chil­dren to be respon­si­ble for their own struc­ture and gives chil­dren phys­i­cal free­dom, accord­ing to Kling.

Ken Finch, for­mer direc­tor of the New Canaan Nature Cen­ter and retired envi­ron­men­tal edu­ca­tor, said out­door play allows chil­dren to escape from adult-designed activ­i­ties. Finch said there is a huge dif­fer­ence between pro­grams such as Lit­tle League, in which rules are cre­at­ed and enforced by adults, and play­ing in the woods, where chil­dren can use their imag­i­na­tion.

“That kind of free play just push­es a child’s mind to explore,” said Finch.

Screen Time Action Net­work Project Man­ag­er Lau­ren Paer said the out­doors nat­u­ral­ly pro­vides chil­dren with open-end­ed toys, like a stick that can be used as a mag­ic wand or a base­ball bat. Many com­mer­cial toys found in stores today have a clear pur­pose, and do not leave room for cre­ativ­i­ty. Paer said out­door play is espe­cial­ly impor­tant for children’s phys­i­cal health. Play­ing out­side helps chil­dren devel­op bal­ance and get expo­sure to nat­ur­al light, which is impor­tant for healthy eye devel­op­ment, accord­ing to Paer.

Not only is out­door play impor­tant for phys­i­cal health, but for men­tal health as well. Finch said spend­ing time in the nat­ur­al envi­ron­ment allows sep­a­ra­tion from dai­ly stres­sors.

“For an awful lot of peo­ple, nature is ther­a­peu­tic. It’s a place of respite. A place of renew­al,” said Finch.

Chil­dren who stay inside to use elec­tron­ic devices miss out on oppor­tu­ni­ties for out­door play cru­cial to human devel­op­ment and well-being. Author and cofounder of Chil­dren & Nature Net­work Richard Louv describes this dis­con­nect between a child and his or her nat­ur­al envi­ron­ment as “nature-deficit dis­or­der,” accord­ing to his book, “Last Child in the Woods.” The term is defined as the psy­cho­log­i­cal, phys­i­cal, spir­i­tu­al, and soci­etal cost of the human dis­con­nec­tion from the nat­ur­al world.

Con­cerned adults like Juber notice that chil­dren are not only miss­ing out on time out­doors, but are form­ing what seems to be addic­tions to screen time. Kling said tak­ing away a screen-depen­dent child’s device caus­es the same pain as phys­i­cal pain does in the brain.

“It works in the same cir­cuit­ry of the brain as drugs would,” said Kling.

Although allow­ing less screen time seems like an easy solu­tion, this is not a straight­for­ward task. Kling said that chil­dren are often con­sum­ing con­tent con­trolled by com­pa­nies that want chil­dren to keep using their devices.

“There are peo­ple on the oth­er side of the phone com­pet­ing for your atten­tion. They’re doing every­thing they can to make sure you are addict­ed,” Kling said.

Paer said cor­po­rate prof­it dri­ves the design and con­tent that chil­dren con­sume. Com­pa­nies invest a lot of mon­ey in psy­cho­log­i­cal research to max­i­mize time a child spends on their dig­i­tal plat­form. “Cor­po­rate prof­it is a huge prob­lem that is a detri­ment to child devel­op­ment,” said Paer.

Paer, who works to pre­vent cor­po­ra­tions from using manip­u­la­tive adver­tis­ing algo­rithms, said that chil­dren are more vul­ner­a­ble to adver­tise­ments because they have under­de­vel­oped crit­i­cal think­ing skills. As a result, chil­dren are unable to dis­tin­guish between an adver­tise­ment and oth­er kinds of con­tent. Paer said that com­pa­nies want to teach chil­dren that hap­pi­ness can be achieved by buy­ing things.

“They want to train young chil­dren to become young con­sumers,” Paer said.

Though it may seem that par­ents should push chil­dren to go out­side more, many fam­i­lies do not feel safe send­ing their chil­dren out­side. Mary Pol­lard, a moth­er from Nor­wich, Con­necti­cut, shared in a phone con­ver­sa­tion that her chil­dren use elec­tron­ics in excess of four hours per day because of their neighborhood’s crime rate.

“Elec­tron­ics are a safer bet than let­ting them walk down the street,” said Pol­lard. Pol­lard said that for her chil­dren, it is more ben­e­fi­cial to play with an iPad than to walk to the park where the pos­si­bil­i­ty of a shoot­ing is greater than zero. Not only is the lack of access to out­door space an issue in neigh­bor­hoods with high­er crime rates, but has been an issue for chil­dren in urban areas.

After col­lege, Finch worked at a nature camp in Mary­land, which housed Wash­ing­ton D.C. pub­lic school stu­dents for sev­er­al nights. On a long board­walk through a marsh, Finch made a joke about see­ing lions, tigers, and bears to the stu­dents. He quick­ly real­ized that they did not know he was jok­ing. Finch guess­es that over half of those stu­dents had nev­er been out of the D.C. metro area in their lives. Accord­ing to Finch, there are ini­tia­tives with­in the parks and recre­ation field that are push­ing for a nat­ur­al park with­in six blocks for every child in big cities.

Paer said par­ents should delay the intro­duc­tion of screens to their chil­dren as much as pos­si­ble. Accord­ing to Paer, there are bound to be pow­er strug­gles between the par­ent and child once devices are intro­duced because of the com­pelling nature of dig­i­tal devices. Once intro­duced, Paer sug­gests co-view­ing elec­tron­ic con­tent with chil­dren, ask­ing them how they feel after­wards, and hav­ing them reflect on the expe­ri­ence. Hav­ing these con­ver­sa­tions once a week allows for them to become proac­tive con­ver­sa­tions instead of reac­tive solu­tions when some­one is in trou­ble, accord­ing to Paer.

Using TV and DVD play­ers instead of hand­held, inter­net-con­nect­ed devices reduces the attach­ment the child has to the device itself, Paer said.

“When hold­ing your tablet, it feels like an appendage. When you’re watch­ing the TV, it stays there and it doesn’t feel like it’s a piece of you,” said Paer. Paer also sug­gests that par­ents should reduce the amount of time spent on their own devices in front of their chil­dren. When chil­dren see that their par­ents’ atten­tion is on some­thing else, Paer said they can become jeal­ous and angry toward elec­tron­ic devices as a whole. Paer also sug­gests reduc­ing the amount of time elec­tron­ic devices are used as a babysit­ter. Paer says chil­dren will become depen­dent on the screen for enter­tain­ment and will even­tu­al­ly lose the mus­cle for enter­tain­ing them­selves.

Instead of giv­ing her grand­son a tablet in the car every morn­ing, Juber has him look out the car win­dow on the way to school. In the spring, he looks for flow­ers in bloom. In the fall, he looks at the col­or­ful leaves and Hal­loween dec­o­ra­tions. Juber gives him 10 points for each scare­crow he finds, and 15 points for each witch. Then, her grand­son adds his points togeth­er. Juber takes the side streets on her dri­ve so her grand­son looks at as many things as pos­si­ble.

“I want him to observe and learn from his sur­round­ings,” Juber said.