Waterbury Plagued by Rising Car Thefts Linked to Repeat Juvenile Offenders

By Ali­cia Gomez
June 23, 2023
Con­necti­cut Examiner 

WATERBURY – When Latonya Inman opened the front door of her Water­bury home Thurs­day morn­ing to dri­ve to work, she was met with an emp­ty space where her 2017 Kia Soul was sup­posed to be. 

She said she called the police and report­ed the car stolen. About two hours lat­er, police told Inman they had seen her car parked on a street about 10 min­utes away. But by the time offi­cers escort­ed Inman to the loca­tion, she found the back win­dows of her vehi­cle had been bust­ed out. 

Although her car was recov­ered, Inman said she had to make an insur­ance copay­ment for the dam­ages, pay $100 for a rental car and miss a day of work. Since the inci­dent, she has installed a steer­ing wheel lock and plans to add cam­eras out­side her home to pre­vent future auto thefts. 

“It’s so time-con­sum­ing, incon­ve­nient and incon­sid­er­ate of these freak­ing knuck­le­heads. I am so angry. I believe par­ents ought to be held account­able,” she said. 

Inman is not alone in her frustration.

Car thefts in Water­bury have expe­ri­enced a sig­nif­i­cant surge, accord­ing to police, with 322 stolen cars report­ed between Jan­u­ary and May of this year com­pared to 204 in the same peri­od last year – a 57 per­cent increase. Offi­cers have arrest­ed more than twice the num­ber of juve­niles than adults for auto thefts this year. Half of these juve­nile arrests involve repeat offend­ers, indi­cat­ing an alarm­ing trend, police said. 

Most juve­niles who com­mit car thefts in Water­bury are one-time offend­ers, local police told CT Exam­in­er, but the major­i­ty of the city’s car thefts are repeat­ed­ly done by a group of about 15 to 20 juve­niles. Police Chief Fer­nan­do Spag­no­lo said he believes there is a lack of engage­ment between fam­i­ly mem­bers and the juve­niles who steal cars.

“They don’t appear to have a lot of sup­port in their fam­i­ly. They don’t real­ly seem to have an inter­est in sup­port from the com­mu­ni­ty, and they con­tin­u­ous­ly engage in this type of dan­ger­ous behav­ior,” he said. 

Local police have been strug­gling since 2017 with juve­nile auto theft. They have been work­ing with the juve­nile pros­e­cu­tor and pro­ba­tion offi­cials, and cre­at­ed a cri­sis inter­ven­tion team with licensed behav­ioral spe­cial­ists for chil­dren, men­tor­ship pro­grams and sum­mer youth employ­ment pro­grams, Spag­no­lo said.

“There’s a lot that we offer them. But, the prob­lem in juve­nile court is… my under­stand­ing is that the judge doesn’t have a lot of author­i­ty to mete out a require­ment of behav­ioral health ser­vices or some oth­er kind of ser­vices until the case is adju­di­cat­ed. We can ask them to come, but very few would take advan­tage of it,” he explained.

Spag­no­lo said more resources need to be invest­ed in these juve­niles rather than lock­ing them up. 

“My sug­ges­tion would be to hold this child and have this child eval­u­at­ed, and maybe even have their fam­i­ly eval­u­at­ed to find out what type of ser­vices or needs the state, a munic­i­pal­i­ty, or the gov­ern­ment in gen­er­al could pro­vide to change the course of direc­tion,” Spag­no­lo said. 

Spag­no­lo added these juve­niles tend to com­mit more vio­lent crimes or the same crimes as adults, and the sys­tem allows them to be held when they are older.

“At some point when you have a child that steals a car five, six, up to 10 times, is brought to juve­nile court … is released back to his fam­i­ly, and that same night steals a car again, and the same police depart­ment picks them up and brings them back – and that hap­pens two or three times in a row – there should be a red flag that goes off, Spag­no­lo said. “There should be a bell that goes off in everyone’s head that says some­thing is wrong and putting this child back into the same exact envi­ron­ment that you took the child from is not the answer.”

Although Spag­no­lo believes the courts should release a child who has com­mit­ted car theft, he also thinks there should be sub­stan­tial super­vi­sion of the child’s life circumstances. 

Inman shared a sim­i­lar view. 

“The par­ents ought to be held account­able because enough is enough. It’s get­ting to be way too much,” she said. “If that were the case, the par­ents would be engaged in their children’s lives and direct­ing them in becom­ing bet­ter ver­sions of themselves.”

Spag­no­lo described these crimes as a crime of opportunity. 

“We don’t live in a soci­ety cur­rent­ly that allows for us to be lais­sez-faire with our prop­er­ty. You need to take some steps to pro­tect your prop­er­ty, and that means lock­ing up your valu­ables, not allow­ing your car to run unat­tend­ed,” he said.

 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *