Magazine

More Schools Add Limits on Student Device Use

By Dan Stark | UConn Jour­nal­ism
Jan­u­ary 27, 2025

School offi­cials through­out south­east­ern Con­necti­cut are seek­ing ways to more effec­tive­ly pre­vent stu­dents from focus­ing too much in-school time on their cell phones at the expense of their edu­ca­tion­al progress. This comes after the State Board of Edu­ca­tion in August urged school dis­tricts to elim­i­nate cell phone use by ele­men­tary and mid­dle school stu­dents dur­ing the school day and severe­ly lim­it the devices’ use by high school stu­dents. 

Offi­cials at some schools in south­east­ern Con­necti­cut updat­ed poli­cies pri­or to the new guide­lines, while oth­ers stood firm with their poli­cies or were already work­ing on updat­ing them when the direc­tive was issued.  

One of the school dis­tricts that altered its pol­i­cy before the new guide­lines were issued is Ston­ing­ton. The dis­trict part­nered with the Uni­ver­si­ty of Con­necti­cut in a study about the con­nec­tion between men­tal health and social media use. As part of the study, mid­dle school stu­dents in grades 6–8 are required to keep their phones in Yon­dr pouch­es, which are mag­net­ic lock­ing pouch­es, for the entire school day, accord­ing to Daniel Kel­ley, a mem­ber of the Ston­ing­ton Board of Edu­ca­tion.  

Kel­ley said the changes result­ed in improved stu­dent engage­ment in the class­room.  

“The amount of engag­ing that we have now is so much bet­ter than it was before,” he said. “They used to have them at the cafe­te­rias and they’d sit there on their phones, text peo­ple and not talk to the peo­ple at their table. Now, every­one is talk­ing like nor­mal.” 

Kel­ley said the board “thought there was going to be more oppo­si­tion to the pouch­es” and there hasn’t been,” and that “most par­ents I’ve talked to are in favor of it,” as well as teach­ers and staff.

He also said the board is con­sid­er­ing imple­ment­ing a sim­i­lar mea­sure at Ston­ing­ton High School. 

“Tech­nol­o­gy can be employed in schools to per­son­al­ize and accel­er­ate learn­ing when inte­grat­ed thought­ful­ly and appro­pri­ate­ly,” the state board of edu­ca­tion wrote in a pol­i­cy state­ment on the issue in August. “How­ev­er, in 2023, the Unit­ed States Sur­geon Gen­er­al issued an Advi­so­ry on Social Media and Youth Men­tal Health, which high­lights the con­cern­ing rela­tion­ship between exces­sive, unre­strict­ed social media use and increased men­tal health chal­lenges in youth.” 

The Lyme-Old Lyme school dis­trict also reviewed its poli­cies just before the state direc­tive was issued. Jason Kemp, chair­man of the Region 18 Board of Edu­ca­tion that over­sees Lyme-Old Lyme schools, said the pre­vi­ous pol­i­cy was “pret­ty sim­i­lar to what we have, but the over­all pol­i­cy was out­dat­ed.” There were, for exam­ple, ref­er­ences to obso­lete tech­nolo­gies such as pagers, he said.  

Under the district’s new pol­i­cy, mid­dle school stu­dents can bring cell phones to school, but the devices must remain in their back­packs at all times, except dur­ing lunch. High school stu­dents have more flex­i­bil­i­ty under the pol­i­cy. They are allowed to use their phones in study hall peri­ods, but are not allowed to use them in reg­u­lar class­es. 

Kemp said the dis­trict has not revis­it­ed the pol­i­cy since the new guide­lines were passed as “the dis­trict was com­fort­able with where we were.”  

“The pol­i­cy allows some flex­i­bil­i­ty with the under­stand­ing that it can’t inter­fere with edu­ca­tion and class, but there’s some allowance the old­er [stu­dents] get,” he said.  

One dis­trict that did not make major changes after the new guide­lines came out is Nor­wich. Under the cur­rent pol­i­cy, stu­dents can take their cell phones to school, but must turn them off upon arriv­ing at school and must keep them in their back­packs or lock­ers through the day, accord­ing to Mark Kulos, the chair­man of the Nor­wich Board of Edu­ca­tion.  

Kulos said the dis­trict did not make major changes to its guide­lines “because our poli­cies were pret­ty much in line, or even stricter than what the state guide­lines were.” He said the board didn’t receive much push­back from par­ents when the pol­i­cy was imple­ment­ed.  

“When we insti­tut­ed the pol­i­cy, I think that most par­ents were in agree­ment in our com­mu­ni­ty that as long as the kids had the phone as that sort of safe­ty net with them, they felt OK that we were enforc­ing the idea of no cell phone use dur­ing school time,” he said.  

Kulos also said he encour­ages par­ents who need to con­tact their stu­dents in emer­gency sit­u­a­tions to call the school direct­ly instead of their child’s cell phones.  

While some dis­tricts have set­tled, at least for the time being, on cell phone poli­cies, oth­er dis­tricts are still in the process of updat­ing those poli­cies. In New Lon­don, for exam­ple, the board of education’s pol­i­cy com­mit­tee is work­ing to cre­ate an updat­ed cell phone pol­i­cy. This work began pri­or to the release of the state guide­lines, accord­ing to board pres­i­dent Elaine May­nard-Adams.  

May­nard-Adams said the com­mit­tee recent­ly sur­veyed mid­dle and high school staff, reveal­ing a close split on what direc­tion to go in, though she not­ed the sur­vey only got a 30% response rate.  

“The feed­back that we had got­ten as of our last pol­i­cy meet­ing, which we didn’t feel was a rep­re­sen­ta­tive sam­pling of the major­i­ty of our staff, but it was pret­ty even­ly split as to those staff mem­bers who felt that this was not a prob­lem ver­sus oth­ers who said this is a prob­lem,” she said. 

May­nard-Adams said that the cre­ation of a new pol­i­cy has been “an eye-open­ing process” to her. She explained she went into the process with the mind­set that stu­dents don’t need cell phones in class­rooms since stu­dents can be reached by call­ing the school direct­ly. 

“After hear­ing from stu­dents, I’m a lit­tle more sym­pa­thet­ic to those who feel they have a valid rea­son for car­ry­ing that phone with them,” she said, includ­ing stu­dents with jobs and stu­dents who are respon­si­ble for their younger sib­lings. 

Addi­tion­al­ly, May­nard-Adams said, “we should not only be look­ing at stu­dent use of cell phones, but staff use as well.” She said while she hasn’t heard of any issues about staff cell phone use, she said she would like to see staff mem­bers held to the same stan­dards as stu­dents.  

“If we are going to say to a stu­dent ‘you have no rea­son to be using your phone dur­ing the instruc­tion­al day,’ I would be hard-pressed to say, ‘but it’s okay for your teach­ers to be tex­ting friends about Sat­ur­day plans,’” she said.