
On Sept. 9, Apple unveiled the two new iPhones: iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 plus, as well as the Apple Watch which will be launched in 2015. The tech news website Macworld covered this news very well. Macworld brought readers the information they wanted.
Macworld released three articles about the iPhone 6 and the Apple Watch, John Phillip’s article covered the information about the Apple Watch, Anthony Domanico wrote the details about the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 plus. However, I preferred the article written by Dan Miller as it summarized all the products.
The article by Miller did not include any videos of the product, just three pictures of the IPhone 6, Apple Watch and Apple Pay. “As was widely expected ahead of the event, Apple unveiled two new iPhone models. Both sport bigger screens than the last generation iPhone 5s: 4.7 inches and 5.5 inches respectively (compared with the 5s’s 4‑inch display).”
Dan Miller focused on the changes to the size of the screen and the price of the product. This article gave the exact datas to help customers compare the different models. Also, Miller produced a photo gallery to show the price of the iPhone 6.

When scrolling down for more information, we can see that Miller spent a lot of time providing details of the Apple Watch. In my mind, the Apple Watch is more attractive than iPhone 6. However, Miller thought it was not a big surprise, ” While the appearance of smartwatch wasn’t a huge surprise, the new wearable will sport some intriguing features when it finally ships in early 2015.” Even Miller was a little disappointed about the Apple Watch, he still listed its features the apple watch has.
I don’t think the headline is clear, but I must admit that the title “Summary…” is very useful. Many people do not want to spend so much time reading different news for individual products. Readers can get all the information they want just by reading one story. Miller used four sources including the Apple official sources to write this news. The story includes useful explanatory details, but because this is a summary, if the readers wanted more information, they would need to read other related stories. I was disappointed that there were no videos as I think the videos would be a useful way of visually explaining the story. The design of the page is a little messy. Readers may be distracted by others advertisements and articles.
Under the summary, there were some comments, it was a way to let people chat online and tell others what they think and what they find. Also, the reporter used several social medias to promote this information, such as Facebook and Twitter. It is successful to attach every pictures to Facebook and Twitter.