Is Copying The New Communication?

This screen grab taken from "Steal This Film II" shows the interconnected web and how consumers connect to share their ideas (screen grab by Erica Brancato)
This screen grab tak­en from “Steal This Film II” uses lines and dots across the screen of media to show the inter­con­nect­ed web and how con­sumers con­nect to share ideas (screen grab by Eri­ca Brancato)

As chil­dren we imi­tate and mod­el our actions after some­one we look up to; this idea of copy­ing nev­er changes as we grow up. In order to be social we are taught to make con­nec­tions and com­mu­ni­cate. “Steal This Film II states that com­mu­ni­ca­tion is essen­tial­ly an act of copy­ing. How we com­mu­ni­cate, espe­cial­ly online, is a series of repro­duc­tion and shared infor­ma­tion to cre­ate a connection.

One of the more impor­tant points “Steal This Film II” high­light­ed was the fact that shar­ing is the essen­tial­ly at the heart of our exis­tence. We learn from imi­ta­tion, which is why peo­ple don’t know any bet­ter when it comes to copy­right and control.

One exam­ple of this copy­ing con­tro­ver­sy was dis­played in a  wired.com arti­cle where a street artist, Shep­ard Fairey, took a pic­ture from the Asso­ci­at­ed Press and trans­formed it into the pres­i­den­tial cam­paign image “Hope” Barack Oba­ma used in 2008. Because of the prof­it Fairey made and its promi­nence across the nation, AP was able to indi­cate that this was their pho­to from 2006 that Fairey used with­out per­mis­sion. Though we can’t ful­ly explain the motive behind Fairey’s use of the AP pho­to, based off of what “Steal This Film II” said, Fairey along with many con­sumers of infor­ma­tion most like­ly didn’t even real­ize the impli­ca­tions of copy­ing this pho­to. It seems as if he, like many con­sumers of the media, sim­ply want­ed to share his cre­ativ­i­ty and stand­point on a preva­lent top­ic and did­n’t real­ize the consequence.

Although this is ille­gal, it hap­pens all the time. Con­sumers in the 21st cen­tu­ry do not under­stand the con­cept of copy­right and con­trol because they were brought up in a soci­ety where you could down­load any­thing off the Inter­net and use it with­out rec­og­niz­ing where it came from.

This con­cept  is dif­fi­cult for not only news orga­ni­za­tions, but also aspir­ing jour­nal­ists because noth­ing is tru­ly orig­i­nal con­tent. Some­where some­body had that idea first, and whether it is inten­tion­al or unin­ten­tion­al you took that idea and made it your own.

Although it is a huge chal­lenge for jour­nal­ists it can ben­e­fit them as well. “Steal This Film II,” point­ed out that con­sumers want to be includ­ed in on the media and that media con­sumers are now becom­ing pro­duc­ers as well. With the use of social media and tech­nol­o­gy, jour­nal­ists may be able to use the eager­ness of con­sumers to be active to help their sto­ry and cre­ate respons­es and fol­low up on a par­tic­u­lar top­ic or issue.

Though pira­cy and copy­ing with­out per­mis­sion are ille­gal, it hap­pens all around us. It will nev­er be stopped, which is why as jour­nal­ists we have to adapt. While we still have to mon­i­tor pla­gia­rism and copy­right and be aware of how our infor­ma­tion is being used, we also should use it to our advan­tage to get the word out about an issue. Accord­ing to “Steal This Film II,” con­sumers want to be involved in the news, so as jour­nal­ists we should use the indi­vid­u­als’ eager­ness to share infor­ma­tion to dis­sem­i­nate infor­ma­tion and gen­er­ate reaction.

Com­mu­ni­ca­tion and the way con­sumers share infor­ma­tion has changed dras­ti­cal­ly whether we like it or not. In order to stay rel­e­vant and in order to be suc­cess­ful, jour­nal­ists must not only be pre­cau­tious of how their infor­ma­tion is used but also be aware that con­sumers shar­ing their infor­ma­tion the prop­er way may ben­e­fit them in the long run.

Leave a Reply