Case Study: Barbara Selvin

Barbara Selvin
Bar­bara Selvin pos­es for a por­trait between ses­sions at the Octo­ber 2023 Jour­nal­ism and Women Sym­po­sium in Chica­go. Selvin worked for News­day in the late 1980s and ear­ly 90s while rais­ing her three kids, even­tu­al­ly leav­ing the news­room when she was no longer eli­gi­ble for a part-time work sched­ule. Pho­to by Made­line Pap­cun

By Made­line Pap­cun | UConn Jour­nal­ism
April 2024

In the late 1980s, Bar­bara Selvin was work­ing as a reporter at New York News­day on the busi­ness desk when she became preg­nant with her first child. 

Selvin said she knew at the time that she did not want to con­tin­ue work­ing full time while tak­ing care of a new­born baby, so she began look­ing into her options.

“News­day did not have any arrange­ments for part-time work, although they did have gen­er­ous mater­ni­ty ben­e­fits,” she said. “So between your mater­ni­ty leave and dis­abil­i­ty [ben­e­fits], you could be out for about five months, but then you were expect­ed to come back to work full time.” 

This was not her ide­al sce­nario. Selvin decid­ed to put her inves­tiga­tive skills to good use, begin­ning a new report­ing project on her own time. She talked to oth­er reporters, man­agers and human resources depart­ments at the 20 largest news­pa­pers in the Unit­ed States to learn about their fam­i­ly work poli­cies. 

Explain­ing this to me while sit­ting at a high-top table by the ele­va­tors in one of Colum­bia College’s build­ings in Chica­go, she laughed. “This was 1987, so news­pa­pers were a big thing. News­pa­pers were still fat and hap­py in 1987.” 

Selvin pre­sent­ed her find­ings to News­day, point­ing out that they were “not com­pet­i­tive” in terms of what they offered, and propos­ing the com­pa­ny offer a job share. 

“That seemed to me the eas­i­est to imple­ment because you would have two peo­ple doing one job,” Selvin said. “You would have one bud­get line.” 

News­day agreed to try it out, though Selvin not­ed their plan was “not a true job share” in that her “part­ner” was not anoth­er reporter on the New York News­day busi­ness desk as she was, but an edi­tor at a dif­fer­ent News­day news­pa­per. 

Addi­tion­al­ly, their “shared bud­get line” only came with one set of health ben­e­fits — so Selvin had to rely on her husband’s ben­e­fits. 

“We both lost vaca­tion pay, sick pay, per­son­al time, dis­abil­i­ty insur­ance, long term insur­ance; there were like six or sev­en or eight ben­e­fits that we lost, so essen­tial­ly we both took pay cuts to do this,” Selvin said. 

News­day also lim­it­ed the job share agree­ment to 18 months.

“But still we were able to con­tin­ue being in the news­room, which was what we both want­ed,” Selvin said. 


At the time, the Graph­ic Com­mu­ni­ca­tions Inter­na­tion­al Union invit­ed Selvin to par­tic­i­pate in con­tract talks on the issue of how to accom­mo­date peo­ple who want­ed to work part time and not just for care­giv­ing rea­sons. 

“It could also be book leave, which is a big thing in news,” Selvin said. “And News­day was, at the time, the sixth largest paper in the coun­try. It was a des­ti­na­tion paper, peo­ple came there after they worked at oth­er dai­ly papers.” 

“It was a pres­ti­gious job to have and so you had top lev­el reporters who want­ed to write books and peo­ple who were com­mit­ted to their work as jour­nal­ists and did­n’t want it to stop.”

In the 1990 con­tract, the GCIU includ­ed a pro­vi­sion allow­ing union mem­bers who were full time at News­day for at least three years to take a min­i­mum of three months and up to 18 months in a part-time posi­tion for rea­sons includ­ing “care of young chil­dren, elder­ly par­ents or dis­abled fam­i­ly mem­bers or oth­er fam­i­ly dif­fi­cul­ties that present the employ­ee with seri­ous prob­lems.”

The con­tract allowed employ­ees on a part-time, fam­i­ly-work sched­ule to keep their health­care, though oth­er ben­e­fits such as paid vaca­tion, per­son­al days, or hol­i­days that occur on days they were not sched­uled to work would be lost. 

Selvin was preg­nant with her sec­ond child in 1990, and took advan­tage of this new oppor­tu­ni­ty. When 1992 “rolled around,” Selvin was com­ing to the end of her sec­ond 18-month part-time posi­tion. 

“They final­ly said ‘Hey, you got­ta either come back or leave,’” Selvin said. But now, with two kids under the age of four, Selvin still want­ed to work part time. News­day would only allow her to do so if she was fill­ing in for anoth­er reporter that was on leave, which she did, switch­ing to the Dis­cov­ery desk to do so. 

Then I had the nerve to get preg­nant again,” Selvin said.

Again, Selvin was involved in the con­tract talks. Now, the News­day com­pa­ny agreed to have an open-end­ed part time with full pro­rat­ed ben­e­fits. 

“Per­fect! Every­thing! Exact­ly what it should have been in the begin­ning,” Selvin said. 

But, she was not eli­gi­ble to par­tic­i­pate, because she wasn’t cov­ered by the union any­more being a part-time employ­ee. She asked man­age­ment to rein­state her in a full-time posi­tion so she could take advan­tage of this, and they said they would have to think about it 

Two months lat­er and sev­en months into her third preg­nan­cy, Selvin’s request was denied. 

“They told me no, they did­n’t want to set a prece­dent, but I could come back any­time and they’d find some­thing for me,” she said. “I’m still mad about that and I knew that I would nev­er go back to News­day after that.”


Selvin left her career as a reporter. She stayed home tak­ing care of her three kids for about five years. 

“I did slow­ly go crazy,” she said. “I kind of threw myself into this project and then that project.” She even pub­lished her ini­tial find­ings on the fam­i­ly work poli­cies of the 20 largest news­pa­pers of the time in the September/October issue of the Colum­bia Jour­nal­ism Review. 

Then, Selvin went into teach­ing jour­nal­ism at the col­lege lev­el. In 2007, she became the first full-time pro­fes­sor of Stony Brook University’s School of Com­mu­ni­ca­tion and Jour­nal­ism “…after help­ing to design what was then the first School of Jour­nal­ism in the SUNY sys­tem and after sev­en years as an adjunct instruc­tor in Stony Brook’s for­mer jour­nal­ism minor,” her bio explains. 

“I did find my way into teach­ing jour­nal­ism and I loved it,” she said. “That’s what I did for the next 25 years.” 

Selvin not­ed her love of teach­ing high­light­ed her influ­ence on oth­ers. 

“I could see the impact I was hav­ing on people’s lives much more clear­ly than I could from my seat in the news­room,” Selvin said. 

Still, had she been able to extend her part-time report­ing posi­tion back in the 1990s, Selvin “no doubt” would have stayed. 

“I would have loved to have had a longer career in the news­room. I would have loved to have gone on, I was a good reporter and I would have real­ly liked to push myself,” she said. “On the oth­er hand, I had fun being with my kids.”