Beyond the Trail: Exploring the National Parks

By George Velky
JOUR 3035
Dec. 10, 2024

Explore America’s nation­al parks with the Beyond the Trail Pod­cast. This series will dive into dif­fer­ent parks across the Unit­ed States and explore things like the his­to­ry of the parks and the risks the parks face. Lis­ten to the first episode and lis­ten to experts about how the Nation­al Park sys­tem was cre­at­ed, how parks are found­ed, and poten­tial risks parks face across the nation.



Post for Instagram
Pho­to of host, George Velky, at Rocky Moun­tain Nation­al Park

Post for Facebook 

Email Newslet­ter

Link to Insta­gram Page

Sources:
His­to­ry of the parks
Info on Muir
About the parks

Script:

George:

Robust Wildlife… Untouched lands… Crys­tal clear waters… From the tow­er­ing peaks of the Rocky Moun­tains to to sun-soaked deserts of the south­west, America’s nation­al parks rep­re­sent a world with­out humans, a mys­te­ri­ous insight into the beau­ty of the nat­ur­al world. 

I’m your host, George Velky, and this is Beyond the Trail. Join me on an adven­ture that hikes the trails and pad­dles the waters of the Nation­al Parks. Learn what makes them so spe­cial, how they came about, and the chal­lenges they face. 

I met with Julie Fos­dick, an earth sci­ences pro­fes­sor at UConn with a PhD in Geo­log­i­cal and Envi­ron­men­tal Sci­ences from Stanford.” 

She was the focal inter­view of the first episode of this pod­cast. Our inter­view start­ed with her expla­na­tion of what exact­ly earth sci­ences are. 

Julie Fos­dick:

  • Sure. ​So, ​um, ​in ​earth ​sci­ences ​we ​can ​study ​any­thing ​from, ​you ​know, ​recent ​geo­log­ic ​process ​to ​deep ​time. ​And ​in ​my ​work ​I ​look ​at ​long ​term ​change ​of ​tec­ton­ic ​plates ​and ​how ​defor­ma­tion ​of ​the ​Earth­’s ​plates ​caus­es ​moun­tains ​to ​form. ​I ​love ​land­scapes, ​I ​love ​moun­tains ​and ​I ​always ​want ​to ​know ​how ​they ​form. ​And ​so ​in ​ther­mochronol­o­gy ​we ​com­bine ​the ​sci­ence ​of ​get­ting ​at ​the ​time ​and ​the ​tem­per­a­ture ​of ​min­er­al ​for­ma­tion ​and ​we ​can ​use ​that ​as ​a ​clock ​that ​char­ac­ter­izes ​when ​a ​land­scape ​is ​uplift­ed ​into ​the ​moun­tains. ​So ​it’s ​basi­cal­ly ​a ​fan­cy ​geo­chem­istry ​tool ​that ​we ​use ​to ​date rocks. 

George: 

Fos­dick teach­es a nation­al parks-based class at UConn called Cre­at­ing and Sus­tain­ing Nation­al Parks. Stu­dents research the parks and meet once a week in a dis­cus­sion about them

The idea of a Nation­al Parks sys­tem was orig­i­nal­ly an Amer­i­can con­cept. In 1872, areas in Mon­tana and Wyoming were pro­tect­ed and estab­lished as Yel­low­stone Nation­al Park by Con­gress. This prece­dent sparked a glob­al move­ment to pro­tect envi­ron­men­tal­ly and cul­tur­al­ly sig­nif­i­cant lands. Cur­rent­ly, there are near­ly 1,200 nation­al parks or equiv­a­lent across over 100 coun­tries. In 1916, Pres­i­dent Woodrow Wil­son cre­at­ed the Nation­al Park Ser­vice, a depart­ment charged with the respon­si­bil­i­ty of main­tain­ing and pro­tect­ing these des­ig­nat­ed lands in Amer­i­ca. Nation­al parks con­tin­ue to be des­ig­nat­ed to this day, the newest of which is New Riv­er Gorge in West Vir­ginia, which was made a nation­al park in 2020. 

The Nation­al Parks sys­tem is respon­si­ble for more than the name-brand nation­al parks though. The sys­tem encom­pass­es Nation­al Bat­tle­fields, Mil­i­tary Parks, His­tor­i­cal Parks and sites, Nation­al forests, Lakeshores, Memo­ri­als, Mon­u­ments, pre­serves, rivers, seashores and more. These would include places like the Lin­coln Memo­r­i­al in Wash­ing­ton D.C. or Cape Cod Nation­al Seashore in Mass­a­chu­setts. Alto­geth­er, there are 432 indi­vid­ual des­ti­na­tions, with loca­tions in all 50 states, and US territories.

It would be remiss to dis­cuss the Nation Parks sys­tem with­out men­tion­ing John Muir (MEER). Muir is known as The Father of Nation­al Parks. He was a writer, sci­en­tist, and philoso­pher who direct­ly influ­enced the cre­ation of many nation­al parks, includ­ing Yosemite, Sequoia, Mount Ranier, and Grand Canyon. He knew pres­i­dents and was good friends with Theodore Roo­sevelt. His influ­ence on Roo­sevelt prompt­ed move­ments that estab­lished near­ly 150 mil­lion acres of nation­al for­est, 23 nation­al mon­u­ments, and 5 nation­al parks.

There are 63 Nation­al Parks spread across the coun­try, many of which vary great­ly in loca­tion, geog­ra­phy and cul­tur­al sig­nif­i­cance. There are the rugged peaks of Rocky Moun­tain Nation­al Park, the serene par­adise at Vir­gin Islands, the crys­tal clear lakes and streams of Voyageurs, the urban St. Louis Arch, and the dank depths at Carls­bad Cav­erns and Mam­moth Cave Nation­al parks. So what war­rants the sig­nif­i­cance to earn the title of a Nation­al Park? What makes them that much more impor­tant than a state park or a nature preserve? 

  • Julie Fos­dick: 
  • Well, ​there ​are ​a ​high­er ​lev­el ​of ​cri­te­ria ​that ​jus­ti­fies ​the ​park. ​So ​it ​has ​to ​have ​some ​sort ​of ​spe­cial, ​either ​nat­ur­al ​or ​cul­tur­al ​sig­nif­i­cance. ​So ​some ​of ​the ​nation­al ​parks ​might ​strike ​you ​as ​not ​as ​• ​clas­si­cal­ly ​nat­ur­al ​as, ​say, ​Yosemite ​or ​Yel­low­stone, ​• ​um, ​Maybe ​in ​Wash­ing­ton, ​D.C. ​there ​are ​lots ​of ​dif­fer­ent ​kinds ​of ​parks ​and ​mon­u­ments, ​and ​nation­al ​parks, ​uh, ​have ​to ​meet ​that ​high ​lev­el ​of ​cri­te­ria ​that ​this ​is ​so ​spe­cial ​to ​us ​that ​we, ​we ​don’t ​want ​it ​to ​be ​pri­va­tized. ​We ​want ​it ​to ​be ​acces­si­ble ​to ​as ​many ​peo­ple ​as ​we ​can. ​And ​some­times ​that ​gets ​com­pli­cat­ed ​because ​it’s ​not ​just, ​uh, ​you ​know, ​any ​local ​per­son, ​but ​we ​want ​lots ​of ​peo­ple ​to ​be ​able ​to ​vis­it ​and study. 
  • uh, ​they ​actu­al­ly ​have ​to ​be, ​uh, ​pro­posed ​and ​then ​approved ​by ​Con­gress. ​So ​there’s ​a ​lot ​of ​polit­i­cal ​steps ​along ​the ​way ​that ​leads ​to ​a ​nation­al ​park. ​So ​it ​actu­al­ly ​is ​a ​very ​polit­i­cal ​process. ​But ​it ​usu­al­ly ​starts ​with ​some, ​um, ​major ​move­ment ​of ​numer­ous, ​• ​• ​uh, ​share­hold­ers ​that ​real­ly ​want ​it ​to ​be ​in ​place. ​So ​usu­al­ly ​there ​are ​envi­ron­men­tal ​groups, ​maybe ​there ​is ​• ​• ​inspired ​sen­a­tor ​who ​thinks ​that ​this ​should ​be ​a ​land ​that’s ​pro­tect­ed. ​And, ​uh, ​it ​has ​to ​be ​jus­ti­fied ​as ​why ​that ​land ​is ​pro­tect­ed ​and ​set ​aside. ​And ​so ​you ​get ​this ​real­ly ​neat ​com­bi­na­tion ​of ​pol­i­cy ​mak­ers, ​sci­en­tists, ​• ​• ​um, ​cli­mate ​activists, ​and ​all ​sorts ​of ​peo­ple ​that ​might ​want ​a ​par­tic­u­lar ​land ​to ​be ​pro­tect­ed ​and ​set ​aside.

George: 

“Bryce Sori­ni, a Senior Plant Sci­ence major at UConn offered his per­spec­tive into the great­ness of Nation­al Parks.” 

  • Bryce Sori­ni:
  • I ​think ​it’s ​impor­tant ​to ​pre­serve ​the ​envi­ron­ment. ​• ​• ​• ​And ​I ​also, ​I ​don’t ​know, ​I ​find ​nat­ur­al ​spaces ​that ​are ​rel­a­tive­ly ​untouched ​to ​be ​like ​the ​pret­ti­est ​thing ​on ​Earth. ​I ​real­ly ​like ​the ​way ​a ​nat­ur­al ​land­scape looks.

George: 

He said his Favorite Park that hes been to is Carls­bad Cav­erns in New Mex­i­co. This park lurks beneath the Chi­huahuan Desert and holds more than 119 caves

  • Bryce Sori­ni:
  • Yeah, ​it’s ​like ​this ​under­ground ​cave ​sys­tem ​which ​it’s ​very, ​like, ​open. ​You ​don’t ​have ​to ​be ​like, ​crawl­ing ​around ​and ​stuff. ​There’s ​like ​a ​nice ​cou­ple ​of ​paths ​through ​the ​cave ​and ​just ​beau­ti­ful ​sta­lag­mites ​and ​sta­lac­tites ​you ​can ​see. Tthere’s, ​uh, ​the ​mouth ​of ​the ​cave ​has, ​like, ​the ​open­ing ​shines ​through ​to ​like, ​a ​deep­er ​part ​of ​the ​cave ​and ​it’s ​always ​like ​sort ​of ​misty ​in ​the ​cave, ​so ​you ​can ​just ​see ​the ​beam ​of ​light ​come down.

George: 

Bryce was an Eagle Scout before he arrived at UConn, and he attrib­ut­es his time in the scouts to his appre­ci­a­tion of the nat­ur­al world. He dove in to some of the sim­i­lar­i­ties with things the scouts offered and Nation­al Parks. 

  • Bryce Sori­ni: 
  • So ​there’s ​north­ern ​tier, ​• ​• ​uh, ​I ​don’t ​remem­ber ​exact­ly ​where ​that ​is, ​but ​it’s ​sort ​of ​like ​a ​moun­tain­ous ​and ​like ​hik­ing ​type ​of ​place. ​It’s ​kind ​of ​pseu­do-fil­a­m­on­tish. ​And ​then ​there’s ​a, ​uh, ​floor ​to ​sea ​base, ​which ​I’ve ​gone ​to. ​Uh, ​they ​basi­cal­ly ​own ​a ​floor ​to ​key. ​• ​And ​you ​go ​out ​there ​for, ​• ​I ​think ​I ​was ​there ​for ​two ​weeks. ​And ​it’s ​like, ​no ​tech­nol­o­gy ​allowed. ​You’re ​on ​island ​time. ​It ​means ​you ​don’t ​know ​what ​time ​it ​is ​the ​entire ​time ​you’re ​there. ​And ​you ​just ​like ​fish ​and ​scu­ba ​and ​oth­er ​stuff ​like ​that. ​You ​live ​on ​an island. 

George:

I men­tioned Fil­a­m­ont, and Bryce men­tioned North­ern Tier. These are Boy Scout Reserve areas sim­i­lar to the nation­al parks, but have lim­it­ed access to cit­i­zens. Fil­a­m­ont is in New Mex­i­co and North­ern Tier is in North­ern Min­neso­ta. Each of these offer unique expe­ri­ences for scouts and young peo­ple to explore and appre­ci­ate some of the nat­ur­al world in the USA. 

Bryce also talked about how his plant sci­ence major has changed his view and appre­ci­a­tion for the parks. He shared some insight into the awe­some­ness of the biol­o­gy and plant life that the nation­al parks have to offer. 

  • Bryce Sori­ni:
  • Ah, ​yeah, ​pret­ty ​much ​all ​nation­al ​parks ​have ​incred­i­ble, ​• ​you ​know, ​uh, ​bio­di­ver­si­ty. ​The ​more, ​gen­er­al­ly ​speak­ing, ​the ​more ​untouched ​a ​place ​is, ​the ​more ​it’s ​going ​to ​have ​main­tained ​some ​lev­el ​of ​eco­log­i­cal ​well­ness. ​And ​I ​think ​that ​applies ​for ​most ​parks. ​I ​was ​def­i­nite­ly ​very ​stunned ​when ​I ​went ​to ​Aca­dia. ​• ​• ​The ​amount ​of ​plants ​that ​are ​there ​that ​are ​just ​nat­ur­al ​and ​you ​know, ​with ​the ​nat­ur­al ​plant ​species, ​it ​attracts ​a ​lot ​of ​like, ​the ​native ​pol­li­na­tors ​and ​even ​like ​mam­mals ​and ​things ​like ​that. ​So ​you ​get ​like, ​uh, ​I ​mean, ​every­thing ​starts ​from ​the ​ground ​up ​with ​plants. ​So ​you ​get ​like ​the ​whole ​land­scape ​pre­served ​real­ly ​well, ​not ​just ​the ​plants, ​but ​I ​mean, ​like, ​as ​a ​plant ​sci­ence ​major, ​• ​• ​• ​um, ​I’m ​just ​very ​appre­cia­tive ​of ​like, ​all ​the ​dif­fer­ent, ​cool, ​intri­cate ​plants ​that ​have ​evolved ​very ​specif­i­cal­ly ​for ​cer­tain ​parts ​of ​the ​coun­try. ​And ​you ​know, ​even ​in ​a ​place ​like ​Bad­lands, ​there’s ​native ​plants ​in ​the ​desert ​that ​you ​would­n’t ​expect ​to ​be ​there. ​But ​they’re ​all, ​you ​know, ​cru­cial­ly ​impor­tant ​for ​one ​species ​or another.’

George: 

A major threat to the Nation­al Parks is cli­mate change. Ris­ing tem­per­a­tures, extreme weath­er events, nat­ur­al dis­as­ters, pol­lu­tion, inva­sive species and species relo­cat­ing due to shift­ing habi­tats and more are cre­at­ing risks for some nation­al parks and the life with­in them. Both Fos­dick and Sori­ni shared insight into how cli­mate change could effect the Nation­al Parks. 

  • Julie Fos­dick:
  • I ​guess ​it ​depends ​on ​where ​you ​are. ​So ​I ​think ​all ​nat­ur­al ​land­scapes, ​uh, ​the ​largest ​threat ​are ​chal­lenges ​to ​nat­ur­al ​cli­mate ​change ​and ​vari­abil­i­ty ​that’s ​affect­ing ​• ​• ​high­er, ​um, ​• ​• ​ero­sion ​of ​land­scapes. ​Uh, ​if ​you’re ​along ​a ​coast­line, ​• ​uh, ​flood­ing ​as ​sea ​lev­el ​is ​ris­ing, ​uh, ​you ​know, ​some ​of ​our ​favorite ​land, ​uh, ​lands ​along ​nation­al ​parks ​like ​the ​Ever­glades, ​will ​be ​under­wa­ter ​in ​the ​next ​hun­dred ​years. ​And ​so ​that ​is ​a ​dif­fer­ent ​risk ​than, ​say, ​some ​of ​the ​parks ​that ​are ​in, ​um, ​you ​know, ​fire ​haz­ard ​zones ​where ​they’re ​burn­ing. ​And, ​you ​know, ​the ​great ​sequoias ​in ​Sequoia ​nation­al ​park, ​like ​those ​will ​be ​burned ​if ​fires ​con­tin­ue ​to ​burn ​out ​at ​the ​race. ​So ​I ​think ​it ​depends, ​uh, ​• ​on ​what ​the ​chal­lenges ​are. ​One ​aspect ​is ​while ​we ​want ​to ​pro­mote ​• ​• ​• ​• ​• ​vis­i­tors ​and ​actions ​in ​parks, ​some ​of ​the ​parks ​are ​way ​over­run ​by ​tourists. ​• ​• ​So ​there’s ​a ​very ​hard ​bal­ance ​between ​the ​local ​park ​rangers ​who ​have ​to ​man­age ​the ​land ​and ​keep ​every­body ​on ​the ​trails ​while ​also ​pre­serv­ing ​what’s there. 
  • Bryce Sori­ni:
  • I mean, ​like, ​there’s ​some ​things ​that ​you ​can’t ​avoid ​even ​if ​you’re ​in ​a ​piece ​of ​land ​that’s ​the­o­ret­i­cal­ly ​not ​touched ​by ​humans. ​Like ​cli­mate ​change ​is ​going ​to ​affect ​every­where ​on ​Earth ​and ​it ​con­tin­ues ​to. ​And, ​uh, ​things ​like ​air ​pol­lu­tion, ​• ​• ​• ​• ​light ​pol­lu­tion ​even, ​which, ​you ​know, ​can ​con­fuse ​• ​• ​bug ​species ​and ​migra­tions ​and ​things ​like ​that. ​• ​Uh, ​yeah, ​they’re ​basi­cal­ly ​just ​those ​aspects ​where ​• ​• ​• ​• ​even ​if ​a ​piece ​of ​land ​is ​not ​devel­oped ​or ​any­thing, ​you’re ​still ​going ​to ​have ​the ​larg­er ​con­se­quences ​for ​things ​that ​are ​affect­ing ​the ​entire ​Earth. ​And ​I ​think ​those ​are ​most, ​most ​of ​would ​apply ​to ​nation­al parks.

George: That’s it for today’s episode of Beyond the Trail. Thank you guys for explor­ing with me. Tune in next week to take a deep dive into the old­est nation­al park, Yellowstone.

Tran­script:
Beyond the Trail Podcast

George Velky: Robust wildlife, untouched lands, crys­tal clear waters. From the towering

peaks of the Rocky Moun­tains to the sun soaked deserts of the South­west, America’s

nation­al parks rep­re­sent a world with­out humans. A mys­te­ri­ous insight into the beauty

of the nat­ur­al world. I’m your host George Velkke and this is beyond the Trail. Join me

on an adven­ture that hikes the trails and pad­dles the waters of the nation­al parks.

Learn what makes them so spe­cial, how they came about and the chal­lenges they face.

I met with Julie Fos­dick, an Earth sci­ences pro­fes­sor at UConn with a PhD in geological

and Envi­ron­men­tal Sci­ences from Stan­ford Uni­ver­si­ty. She was the focal inter­view of

the first episode of this pod­cast. Our inter­view start­ed with her expla­na­tion of what

exact­ly earth sci­ences are.

Julie Fos­dick: In earth sci­ences, we can study any­thing from recent geo­log­ic process to

deep time. And in my work I look at long term change of tec­ton­ic plates and how

defor­ma­tion of the earth­’s plates caus­es moun­tains to form. I love land­scapes, I love

moun­tains and I always want to know how they form. And so in ther­mochronol­o­gy we

com­bine the sci­ence of get­ting at the time and the tem­per­a­ture of min­er­al formation.

And we can use that as a clock that char­ac­ter­izes when a land­scape is uplift­ed into the

moun­tains. So it’s basi­cal­ly a fan­cy geo­chem­istry tool that we use to date rocks.

George Velky: Fos­dick teach­es a nation­al parks Space class at UConn called Creating

and Sus­tain­ing Nation­al Parks. Stu­dents research the parks and meet once a week in a

dis­cus­sion about them. The idea of a Nation­al park sys­tem was orig­i­nal­ly an Amer­i­can­con­cept. In 1872 Areas of Mon­tana and Wyoming were pro­tect­ed and estab­lished as

Yel­low­stone nation­al park by Con­gress. This prece­dent sparked a glob­al move­ment to

pro­tect envi­ron­men­tal­ly and cul­tur­al­ly sig­nif­i­cant lands. Cur­rent­ly, there are near­ly 1,200

nation­al parks are equiv­a­lent across over 100 dif­fer­ent coun­tries in the world. In 1916,

Pres­i­dent Woodrow Wil­son cre­at­ed the Nation­al Park Ser­vice, a depart­ment charged

with the respon­si­bil­i­ty of main­tain­ing and pro­tect­ing these des­ig­nat­ed lands. In

Amer­i­ca, nation­al parks con­tin­ue to be des­ig­nat­ed to this day. The newest of which is

New Riv­er Gorge in West Vir­ginia, which was made of Nation­al park in 2020. The

Nation­al Park Sys­tem is respon­si­ble for more than just the name brand parks though.

The sys­tem encom­pass­es things like nation­al bat­tle­fields, mil­i­tary parks, historical

parks and sites, nation­al forests, nation­al lakeshores, nation­al memo­ri­als and

mon­u­ments, pre­serves, rivers, seashores and more. These would include places like

the Lin­coln memo­r­i­al in Wash­ing­ton D.C. or Cape God Nation­al Seashore in

Mass­a­chu­setts. Alto­geth­er, there are 432 indi­vid­ual des­ti­na­tions with loca­tions in all 50

states and US ter­ri­to­ries. I would be remiss to dis­cuss the Nation­al Park Sys­tem without

men­tion­ing John Muir. Muir is known as the father of the nation­al parks. He was a

writer, a sci­en­tist, a nat­u­ral­ist, and a philoso­pher who direct­ly influ­enced the cre­ation of

many nation­al parks and the sys­tem we know and love today. These parks included

Yosemite, Sequoia, Mount Rainier and the Grand Canyon. He per­son­al­ly knew three

dif­fer­ent pres­i­dents and was good friends with Ted­dy Roo­sevelt. His influ­ence over

Roo­sevelt prompt­ed move­ments that estab­lished near­ly 150 mil­lion acres of protected

nation­al for­est, 23 nation­al mon­u­ments, and five nation­al parks. Cur­rent­ly, there are 63

nation­al parks spread across the coun­try, all of which vary great­ly in location,

geog­ra­phy and cul­tur­al sig­nif­i­cance. There are the rugged peaks of the Rocky Mountain

nation­al park, the serene par­adise at Vir­gin Islands nation­al park, the crys­tal clear lakes

and streams of voy­agers in north­ern Min­neso­ta, the urban St. Louis Arch, and the dank

depths of Car­l’bad Cav­erns, Wind and Mam­moth Cave nation­al parks. So what­war­rants the sig­nif­i­cance to earn the title of a nation­al park? What makes them so

much more impor­tant than a state park or a nature preserve?

Julie Fos­dick: Well, there are a high­er lev­el of cri­te­ria that jus­ti­fies the park. So it has to

have some sort of spe­cial, either nat­ur­al or cul­tur­al sig­nif­i­cance. So some of the

nation­al parks might strike you as not as clas­si­cal­ly nat­ur­al as, say, Yosemite or

Yel­low­stone, Maybe in Wash­ing­ton, D.C. there are lots of dif­fer­ent kinds of parks and

mon­u­ments, and nation­al parks, have to meet that high lev­el of cri­te­ria that this is so

spe­cial to us that we don’t want it to be pri­va­tized. We want it to be acces­si­ble to as

many peo­ple as we can. And some­times that gets com­pli­cat­ed because it’s not just,

you know, any local per­son, but we want lots of peo­ple to be able to vis­it and study. they

actu­al­ly have to be, pro­posed and then appro. By Con­gress. So there’s a lot of political

steps along the way that leads to a nation­al park. So it actu­al­ly is a very political

process,

00:05:00

Julie Fos­dick: but it usu­al­ly starts with some, major move­ment of numerous,

share­hold­ers that real­ly want it to be in place. So usu­al­ly there are environmental

groups. Maybe there is an inspired sen­a­tor who thinks that this should be a land that’s

pro­tect­ed, and it has to be jus­ti­fied as why that land is pro­tect­ed and set as. And so you

get this real­ly neat com­bi­na­tion of pol­i­cy mak­ers, sci­en­tists, cli­mate activists, and all

sorts of peo­ple that might want a par­tic­u­lar land to be pro­tect­ed and set aside.

George Velky: Bryce Serni, a senior plant sci­ence major at UConn, offered his

per­spec­tive into the great­ness of nation­al parks.Bryce Sori­ni: I think it’s impor­tant to pre­serve the envi­ron­ment. And I also, I don’t Know,

I find nat­ur­al spaces that are rel­a­tive­ly untouched to be like, the pret­ti­est thing on Earth.

I real­ly like the way a nat­ur­al land­scape looks.

George Velky: He said he’s vis­it­ed around five, and his favorite that he’s been to is

Car­l’s­bad Cav­erns in New Mex­i­co. This park lurks beneath the Chi­huahuan Desert and

holds more than 119 dif­fer­ent caves.

Bryce Sori­ni: Yeah, it’s like this under­ground cave sys­tem which, like, it’s very, like,

open. You don’t have to be, like, crawl­ing around and stuff. There’s like a nice cou­ple of

paths through the cave and just beau­ti­ful sta­lag­mites and sta­lac­tites. You can see

there’s, the mouth of the cave has, like, the open­ing shines through to, like, a deeper

part of the cave. And it’s always like, sort of misty in the cave, so you can just see the

beam of light come down.

George Velky: Bryce was an Eagle Scout before he arrived at Yuk­conn, and he

attrib­ut­es his time in the Scouts to his appre­ci­a­tion of the nat­ur­al world. He dove into

some of the sim­i­lar­i­ties with the things the Scouts offered and things the nation­al parks

offer.

Bryce Sori­ni: There’s at least three large swaths of land that were, owned by the Boy

Scouts that kind of mim­ic nation­al parks. You just go there for a cou­ple weeks and live

out in nature. And I don’t know, I’ve always thought that was real­ly cool. So national

parks are sort of a way to keep that going and make sure that, you know, that’s an

expe­ri­ence that we’ll have for generations.

George Velky: So I know about Fil­mont in New Mex­i­co. What are the oth­er swaths ofland?

Bryce Sori­ni: So there’s North­ern Tier. I don’t remem­ber exact­ly where that is, but it’s

sort of like a moun­tain­ous and like, hik­ing type of place. It’s kind of Pseudoil­mont is.

And then there’s a, Floo­ra sea base, which I’ve gone to. they basi­cal­ly own a floor to

key. And you go out there for. I think I was there for two weeks. And it’s like, no

tech­nol­o­gy allowed. You’re on island time. It means you don’t know what time it is the

entire time you’re there. And you just like fish and scu­ba and oth­er stuff like that. You

live on an island.

George Velky: I men­tioned Philem­mont and Bryce men­tioned North­ern Tier. These are

both sim­i­lar to sea bass as their Boy Scout reserves and areas sim­i­lar to the national

parks. The dif­fer­ence is they have lim­it­ed access to cit­i­zens. Fil­a­ment is in New Mexico,

and North­ern Tier is in north­ern Min­neso­ta. Each of these three loca­tions offer unique

expe­ri­ences for Scouts and young peo­ple to explore them and appre­ci­ate some of the

nat­ur­al world in the usa. Bryce also talked about how his plant sci­ence major has

changed his view and appre­ci­a­tion for the parks. He shared some insight into the

awe­some­ness of the biol­o­gy and plant life that the nation­al parks have to offer.

Bryce Sori­ni: Pret­ty much all nation­al parks have incred­i­ble, you know, bio­di­ver­si­ty. The

more, gen­er­al­ly speak­ing, the more untouched a place is, the more it’s going to have

main­tained some lev­el of eco­log­i­cal well­ness. And I think that applies for most parks. I

was def­i­nite­ly very stunned when I went to Aca­dia. the amount of plants that are there

that are just nat­ur­al and, you know, with the nat­ur­al plant species, it attracts a lot of,

like, the native pol­li­na­tors and even, like mam­mals and things like that. So you get like, I

mean, every­thing starts from the ground up with plants. So you get like the whole

land­scape pre­served real­ly well, not just the plants, but, I mean, like, as a plant sci­ence­ma­jor, I’m just very appre­cia­tive of, like, all the dif­fer­ent, cool, intri­cate plants that have

evolved very specif­i­cal­ly for cer­tain parts of the coun­try. And know, even in a place like

Bad­lands, there’s native plants in the desert that you would­n’t expect to be there. But

they’re all, you know, cru­cial­ly impor­tant for one species or another.

George Velky: A major threat to the Nation­al Park Sys­tem is cli­mate change. Rising

tem­per­a­tures, extreme weath­er, nat­ur­al dis­as­ters, pol­lu­tion, inva­sive species, species

relo­cat­ing due to shift­ing habi­tats, and more are cre­at­ing seri­ous risks for some

nation­al parks and the life with­in them. Both Fos­dick and Ceeni shared some insight

into how cli­mate change could and is affect­ing the nation­al parks.

Julie Fos­dick: I guess it depends on where you are. So I think all natural

00:10:00

Julie Fos­dick: land­scapes, the largest threat are chal­lenges to nat­ur­al cli­mate change

and vari­abil­i­ty that’s affect­ing, high­er ero­sion of land­scapes. if you’re along a coastline,

fl flood­ing as sea lev­el is ris­ing. you know, some of our favorite, lands along national

parks, like the Ever­glades, will be under­wa­ter in the next hun­dred years. And so that is

a dif­fer­ent risk than, say, some of the parks that are in, you know, fire haz­ard zones

where they’re burn­ing. And, you know, the great sequoias in Sequoia nation­al park, like,

those will be burned if fires con­tin­ue to burn out at the race. So I think it depends, on

what the chal­lenges are. One aspect is, while we want to pro­mote vis­i­tors and actions

in parks, some of the parks are way over­run by tourists. So there’s a very hard balance

between the local park rangers who have to man­age the land and keep every­body on

the trails while also pre­serv­ing what’s there.Bryce Sori­ni: There’s some things that you can’t avoid even if you’re in a piece of land

that’s, you know, the­o­ret­i­cal­ly not touched by humans. Like cli­mate change is gonna

affect every­where on Earth and, and it con­tin­ues to. And things like air pol­lu­tion, light

pol­lu­tion, even, which know, can con­fuse bug species and migra­tions and things like

that. yeah, they’re basi­cal­ly just those aspects where even if a piece of land is not

devel­oped or any­thing, you’re still going to have the larg­er con­se­quences for things that

are affect­ing the entire Earth. And I think those are most of what apply to nation­al parks.

George Velky: That’s it for today’s episode of beyond the Trail. Thank you guys so much

for explor­ing with me. Tune in next week to take a deep dive into the old­est national

park in the States, Yellowstone.

00:11:43