Food insecurity on the rise in Connecticut

By Kitan Arole, Aman­da Gon­za­lez and Alexan­der Klancko | UConn Jour­nal­ism
Jan­u­ary 7, 2026

A woman in a purple shirt holding a gray cat in her lap.
Kel­ly Ver­ri­er and her cat Hen­ri at their New Haven home. Ver­ri­er is food inse­cure and says feed­ing Hen­ri often takes prece­dence over feed­ing her­self. PHOTO: Kitan Arole.

Kel­ly Ver­ri­er, who lives with her cat Hen­ri in New Haven, said she some­times must choose between feed­ing her pet or her­self. Feed­ing Hen­ri means she’ll go to bed hun­gry.

“I am one of those pet own­ers that make sure she’s fed before I am,” Ver­ri­er, 45, said. “Okay, she’s tak­en care of. That’s fine, I’ll eat tomor­row.”

Ver­ri­er is one of more than 516,000 peo­ple in Con­necti­cut who strug­gle with hunger, accord­ing to Feed­ing Amer­i­ca. That amounts to 1 in 7 Con­necti­cut res­i­dents fac­ing food inse­cu­ri­ty, includ­ing 122,000 – or 1 in 6 – chil­dren in the state.

Ver­ri­er said that gro­cery store prices are too expen­sive, and that food banks are not always accom­mo­dat­ing enough for her dis­abil­i­ties. She said she often lives off water and one meal a day.

The plight of food-inse­cure res­i­dents in the state became more vis­i­ble in the fall when a 43-day shut­down of the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment caused a pause in fed­er­al Sup­ple­men­tal Nutri­tion Assis­tance Pro­gram, or SNAP, ben­e­fits to the hun­gry. Food pantries and soup kitchens were inun­dat­ed with res­i­dents in need — but also saw an out­pour­ing of dona­tions.

In addi­tion, big changes to the sys­tem which are going into effect as a result of the Big Beau­ti­ful Bill Act may result in more peo­ple being forced off the sys­tem. Connecticut’s Depart­ment of Social Ser­vices esti­mates around 36,000 peo­ple in the state are at risk of los­ing food assis­tance under the changes, which expand work require­ments.

Since the COVID-19 pan­dem­ic, the num­ber of food inse­cure peo­ple in Con­necti­cut has increased by 152,000, accord­ing to Con­necti­cut Food­share. In 2023, Connecticut’s statewide food inse­cu­ri­ty rate was 14.3%, but the rate is much high­er in some cities and towns, accord­ing to Map the Meal Gap, a nation­wide resource pro­duced by Feed­ing Amer­i­ca.

In Hart­ford, the food inse­cu­ri­ty hit 24.6% in 2025, fol­lowed by 23% in Water­bury, 22.5% in Bridge­port, 22.3% in New Haven and 21.8% in Wind­ham, accord­ing to Food­share.

“It’s affect­ing every town in Con­necti­cut,” Olivia Gius­to, Foodshare’s strat­e­gy and engage­ment coor­di­na­tor, said. “It affects every town dif­fer­ent­ly, but it is impact­ing the neigh­bors liv­ing in every town. It’s a big issue.”

Accord­ing to Food­share, increased food prices and stag­nant wages are forc­ing fam­i­lies to make a choice between neces­si­ties.

“The wages [are] not match­ing up to what is need­ed real­ly to thrive in Con­necti­cut,”Gius­tosaid. “When we think about cost of hous­ing, cost of child­care, cost of food, cost of health­care, all those things can make peo­ple be in sit­u­a­tions where they have to make real­ly tough deci­sions.”

Jason Jakubows­ki, the pres­i­dent and CEO of Food­share, said the sud­den halt in ben­e­fits last fall trig­gered an imme­di­ate surge in food assis­tance needs.

Jakubows­ki esti­mat­ed that about 90% of the 360,000 res­i­dents in Con­necti­cut on SNAP also use Food­share-sup­port­ed pantries or resources at some point dur­ing the year.

“We are see­ing longer lines than we did dur­ing the pan­dem­ic,” Jakubows­ki said dur­ing the shut­down. “We had to hire 21 tem­po­rary staff mem­bers and rent eight addi­tion­al trucks just to keep up.”

Jakubows­ki said Food­share part­ners with rough­ly 600 pantries and com­mu­ni­ty pro­grams statewide, all of which saw increased demand as the shut­down unfold­ed.

“It was not easy to pre­pare because of the man-made nature of the shut­down,” he said. “As soon as it began, our board autho­rized $1 mil­lion in emer­gency spend­ing so we could respond quick­ly.”

Dan Gia­co­mi, who man­ages the SNAP pro­gram for the state Depart­ment of Social Ser­vices, said that fam­i­lies with chil­dren, senior cit­i­zens and peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ties make up a large share of the state’s SNAP recip­i­ents, plac­ing some of the most vul­ner­a­ble res­i­dents at risk when ben­e­fits were halt­ed. He added that SNAP is close­ly tied to the state’s food econ­o­my.

“There is an eco­nom­ic mul­ti­pli­er to the SNAP ben­e­fit,” he said. “For every dol­lar that goes in, it could be up to $1.50 that it gives back to the com­mu­ni­ty. It sup­ports small gro­cers, farm­ers, farmhands — every­one along that chain.”

In Con­necti­cut, Lati­no and Black peo­ple were dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly affect­ed by food inse­cu­ri­ty post-pan­dem­ic, accord­ing to Map the Meal Gap. In 2023, 30% of Lati­nos and 27% of Black peo­ple were food inse­cure while 10% of white peo­ple were food inse­cure in the Nau­gatuck Val­ley Plan­ning Region, accord­ing to Map the Meal Gap.

State Rep. Ger­al­do Reyes Jr., D‑Waterbury, said he has seen the racial dis­par­i­ties in food secu­ri­ty in the Nau­gatuck Val­ley region first­hand.

“Unfor­tu­nate­ly, in the down­turn, it’s hurt­ing the peo­ple of col­or more than any­body else because they’re already at the bot­tom of the list to begin with,” he said.

Reyes said he has seen an uptick in res­i­dents vis­it­ing the St. Vin­cent DePaul Mis­sion Soup Kitchen in Water­bury. About five years ago, he said St. Vin­cent DePaul was feed­ing about 100 to 120 peo­ple a day. Today, they are serv­ing dou­ble the amount.

“I’ve sent so many peo­ple to the food shel­ter. Before, you nev­er used to see peo­ple that had jobs in line,” Reyes said. “You do now. Now you see peo­ple that are work­ing pay­check-to-pay­check, and you nev­er used to see it.”

State Rep. Nick Mena­pace, D‑East Lyme, said fed­er­al cuts to SNAP are hurt­ing many Con­necti­cut res­i­dents, and the effects can be far-reach­ing.

“We know that … they’re going to be bet­ter engaged in soci­ety, if they don’t have to wor­ry about hav­ing enough food to eat,” Mena­pace said. “This attempt to try and save mon­ey by mak­ing peo­ple suf­fer is not just immoral, but… it doesn’t make sense finan­cial­ly, and it doesn’t real­ly make sense pol­i­cy wise.”

Dur­ing the shut­down, Lee Hay, direc­tor of the Cor­ner­stone Foundation’s food pantry in the Rockville sec­tion of Ver­non, said he saw peo­ple come in and cry, telling him they nev­er thought they would have to ask for free food.

“It breaks your heart,” he said.

Older man with maroon sweater standing in front of boxes of nonperishable food.
Lee Hay, direc­tor of the Cor­ner­stone Foundation’s food pantry in the Rockville sec­tion of Ver­non. PHOTO: Aman­da Gon­za­lez

Grace Bouch­er, Cornerstone’s exec­u­tive direc­tor, said the num­ber of peo­ple com­ing into the com­mu­ni­ty kitchen dou­bled dur­ing the shut­down, going from about 50 peo­ple to 100.  Accord­ing to Food­share, 18% of the peo­ple in Ver­non were food inse­cure as of 2025.

Bouch­er said that thank­ful­ly, the shut­down prompt­ed many peo­ple to donate food.

“Peo­ple have real­ly risen to the occa­sion of know­ing that oth­ers are in mourn­ing,” Bouch­er said. “We have peo­ple stop­ping by every day bring­ing us food and we are very, very grate­ful for all the com­mu­ni­ty sup­port.”

At the Covenant Food Pantry and Soup Kitchen in Willi­man­tic, local res­i­dents came in for food in Octo­ber as the pause in SNAP ben­e­fits was loom­ing.

“We saw peo­ple rush­ing to the food pantries in Octo­ber because they knew they wouldn’t be able to make ends meet,” Anya Waliko­nis, man­ag­er of com­mu­ni­ty pro­grams and ser­vices at the soup kitchen, said. “The tough part was that our shelves were already look­ing very emp­ty.”

The demand was still high on a Mon­day in ear­ly Decem­ber when a line of 75 peo­ple stretched out the door. Inside, Waliko­nis and Exec­u­tive Direc­tor Kim­ber­ly Clark scram­bled to keep shelves stocked and spir­its lift­ed.

“Peo­ple are hav­ing a hard time because we don’t have enough meat, milk and eggs. We don’t have non­per­ish­ables,” Clark said. “We went long peri­ods of time with­out milk and veg­eta­bles, and we’re send­ing peo­ple to the store to buy at retail cost because Food­share didn’t have those things avail­able to us for pur­chase.”

The shut­down end­ed on Nov. 12 when Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump signed a bill that will fund the gov­ern­ment until Jan. 30. SNAP and oth­er essen­tial ser­vices will be fund­ed until Sep­tem­ber 2026, NPR report­ed. How­ev­er, new work require­ments imple­ment­ed by Con­gress will see thou­sands of peo­ple in Con­necti­cut at risk of los­ing their ben­e­fits in 2026.

Ver­ri­er, the New Haven woman fac­ing food inse­cu­ri­ty, said she tends to buy unhealthy food options because they are eas­i­er to make. Ver­ri­er said she has dam­aged nerves, mus­cle pain and heart issues which makes it hard­er for her to make a nutri­tious meal.

“I am in con­stant pain, and stand­ing on my feet is not an option,” Ver­ri­er said.

She wish­es that more peo­ple would under­stand what it’s like to face hunger.

”It’s like I’m scream­ing [for] help in the mid­dle of a crowd, and nobody sees me,” Ver­ri­er said. “I’m just com­plete­ly invis­i­ble.”

UConn Jour­nal­ism stu­dent Elise Rodriguez con­tributed to this sto­ry. Kitan Arole, Aman­da Gon­za­lez and Alexan­der Klancko are all UConn Jour­nal­ism stu­dents.