Trump’s attacks on public history draw scrutiny

Still image from a record­ing of “Pub­lic His­to­ry in Author­i­tar­i­an Times,” a sym­po­sium host­ed by the Gilder Lehrman Cen­ter and MacMil­lan Cen­ter at Yale Uni­ver­si­ty and co-spon­sored by the Uni­ver­si­ty of Connecticut’s Human­i­ties Insti­tute.

By Lily Gold­blatt
UConn Jour­nal­ism

Pol­i­tics shape the pub­lic mem­o­ry of his­to­ry. From Nazi Ger­many to the Amer­i­can Civ­il War and the Japan­ese Intern­ment camps in the Unit­ed States dur­ing World War II, his­to­ri­ans have the task of research­ing his­tor­i­cal accounts to ver­i­fy the facts.

But today, the U.S. is mired in a “his­to­ry war” in which polit­i­cal forces attempt to shut down well-researched and schol­ar­ly accounts of his­to­ry in the name of “patri­o­tism, nation­al­ism, pride,” warned David W. Blight, direc­tor of Yale University’s Gilder Lehrman Cen­ter for the Study of Slav­ery, Resis­tance, and Abo­li­tion in his open­ing remarks at a recent sym­po­sium. “We’ve nev­er lived in a time when the exec­u­tive branch of the gov­ern­ment, almost in its total­i­ty, has assault­ed what we do as it is now.”

Schol­ars and his­to­ri­ans from around the world gath­ered at Yale’s Luce Hall in ear­ly Novem­ber 2025 to dis­cuss “Pub­lic His­to­ry in Author­i­tar­i­an Times.” Spon­sored by the Gilder Lehrman Cen­ter and the MacMil­lan Cen­ter at Yale and co-spon­sored by the Uni­ver­si­ty of Connecticut’s Human­i­ties Insti­tute, the sym­po­sium fea­tured a morn­ing pan­el com­par­ing per­spec­tives from dif­fer­ent coun­tries that have con­front­ed author­i­tar­i­an­ism and an after­noon pan­el that focused on the Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump administration’s attacks on pub­lic his­to­ry at the Smith­son­ian Insti­tu­tion and in nation­al parks.

The exte­ri­or of the Nation­al Muse­um of African Amer­i­can His­to­ry and Cul­ture in Wash­ing­ton, D.C., on Feb­ru­ary 27, 2020, as seen from 15th Street NW. His­to­ri­ans say that Don­ald Trump’s admin­is­tra­tion is attempt­ing to erase parts of Amer­i­can his­to­ry. Pho­to cour­tesy of Share­Alike 4.0 Inter­na­tion­al

Jen­nifer Allen, a pro­fes­sor of Ger­man and Euro­pean his­to­ry at Yale, said her research on post-war Ger­many focus­es not on the Nazi regime, but what comes after “the dust from the rub­ble set­tles.”

In the imme­di­ate after­math of World War II, Ger­many tried to shift away from its actions dur­ing the war and pre­sent­ed Nazism as being “the work of a small group of crim­i­nals,” Allen said. “The optics of mem­o­ry are kind of sig­nif­i­cant here in the ear­ly evo­lu­tion of pub­lic his­to­ry in Ger­many.”

Ger­many attempt­ed to per­form a kind of era­sure of the past through a “lev­el­ing of his­tor­i­cal topog­ra­phy.”

“Mov­ing names, remov­ing sym­bols, demol­ish­ing build­ings that hadn’t already been reduced to rub­ble,” Allen said.

After an author­i­tar­i­an regime, mem­bers of the pub­lic play an impor­tant role in pre­serv­ing pub­lic mem­o­ry. In Ger­many, the “Stum­bling Stones” memo­r­i­al project pre­serves the mem­o­ry of Holo­caust vic­tims through brass-cov­ered cob­ble­stones in pub­lic streets, each etched with a victim’s name.

“This project is fas­ci­nat­ing in that it’s entire­ly grass­root,” Allen said. “It is ini­ti­at­ed, fund­ed, researched, installed and main­tained by real­ly an army of ordi­nary peo­ple.”

Instead of hav­ing a cen­tral­ized memo­r­i­al, the stum­bling stones are some­thing that can’t be avoid­ed because they’re on people’s dai­ly com­mutes.

“As an anal­o­gy to sug­gest how sig­nif­i­cant this would be: imag­ine mini mon­u­ments to the vic­tims of ICE raids,” Allen said.

Much like Ger­many, the U.S. has a com­pli­cat­ed rela­tion­ship with its actions dur­ing World War II, such as when Pres­i­dent Franklin Roo­sevelt issued exec­u­tive orders that allowed Japan­ese Amer­i­cans to be round­ed up and put in camps with­out due process.

“What real­ly made the sto­ry of the Japan­ese Amer­i­can incar­cer­a­tion so chal­leng­ing is that the gov­ern­ment san­i­tized it, they didn’t want it taught in our pub­lic school sys­tems,” said Shirley Higuchi, a lawyer and author who has stud­ied the his­to­ry Japan­ese intern­ment.

Much like the san­i­ti­za­tion of the Japan­ese intern­ment camps, the pol­i­tics of mem­o­ry has caused a revival of the Con­fed­er­a­cy in pol­i­tics and nation­al nar­ra­tives, not­ed Blight.

“The real mean­ing of the Amer­i­can Civ­il War was … altered great­ly,” Blight said.

Today, the Smith­son­ian Insti­tu­tion and the Nation­al Park Ser­vice, two insti­tu­tions that seek to bring truth to America’s his­tor­i­cal nar­ra­tives, have been tar­get­ed by sev­er­al exec­u­tive orders and bills that threat­en the accu­ra­cy of how they tell Amer­i­can his­to­ry.

The entrance sign to Mam­moth Cave Nation­al Park in Brownsville, Ky. on Oct. 28, 2017. Don­ald Trump has signed sev­er­al exec­u­tive orders direct­ing nation­al parks on how they should tell Amer­i­can his­to­ry. Pho­to Cour­tesy of the U.S. Nation­al Park Ser­vice.

Accord­ing to Ger­ry Sea­vo James, deputy direc­tor of Sier­ra Club’s Out­doors for All cam­paign, Trump’s bud­get bill that passed in July has “delet­ed so many great pro­grams that cre­at­ed near­by nature and trail sys­tems for unrep­re­sent­ed com­mu­ni­ties.”

Addi­tion­al­ly, James said Trump’s Exec­u­tive Order 3431, “Restor­ing Truth and San­i­ty to Amer­i­can His­to­ry,” hit him in the gut as it undid years of work dis­man­tling the “ecosys­tem of struc­tur­al racism with­in the parks” and the mis­sion for parks to tell more diverse sto­ries.

Accord­ing to James, this order cre­at­ed a “QR snitch sys­tem.” The order encour­ages peo­ple to report “any signs or oth­er infor­ma­tion that are neg­a­tive about either past or liv­ing Amer­i­cans or that fail to empha­size the beau­ty, grandeur, and abun­dance of land­scapes and oth­er nat­ur­al fea­tures,” the exec­u­tive order said.

James and his team mobi­lized their sup­port­ers to use this sys­tem to push for inclu­sive his­to­ries in the parks and nation­al mon­u­ments.

“His­to­ry should be told accu­rate­ly, whether it hurts your snowflake feel­ings or not,” said one of the com­ments read by James. Anoth­er likened the QR codes to North Korea or East Ger­many, James said.

After the exec­u­tive order, the White House noti­fied the Smith­son­ian that it would be con­duct­ing reviews of muse­um dis­plays to “ensure align­ment with the president’s direc­tive to cel­e­brate Amer­i­can excep­tion­al­ism, remove divi­sive or par­ti­san nar­ra­tives, and restore con­fi­dence in our shared cul­tur­al insti­tu­tions.”

“Our exper­tise is being deval­ued in the pub­lic realm,” said Sarah Weick­sel, exec­u­tive direc­tor at the Amer­i­can His­tor­i­cal Asso­ci­a­tion. “What was once his­to­ri­ans’ call­ing card – our deep knowl­edge and our evi­dence-based method­olog­i­cal approach­es – is being cast as sus­pect by the admin­is­tra­tion.”

Chuck Sams, the first Native Amer­i­can to serve as direc­tor of the Nation­al Park Ser­vice, said the nation­al parks tell his­to­ries fol­low­ing a set of reg­u­la­tions that are revis­it­ed and updat­ed every few years to ensure they are being told accu­rate­ly and to make sure there are no miss­ing nar­ra­tives from this sto­ry.

“We have been able to do this for over 100 years, and what I see now scares me,” Sams said. “Our parks are a direct reflec­tion of our democ­ra­cy.”

Chad Williams, a pro­fes­sor of his­to­ry and Black dias­po­ra stud­ies at Boston Uni­ver­si­ty, said it’s impor­tant to pro­tect insti­tu­tions such as the Smith­son­ian to keep the pub­lic mem­o­ry of U.S. his­to­ry accu­rate and true.

“In the con­text of the Black expe­ri­ence in this coun­try, sim­i­lar to the expe­ri­ence of indige­nous peo­ple in this coun­try, author­i­tar­i­an­ism is not new,” Williams said. “Hav­ing that his­to­ry on dis­play in a place like the Nation­al Muse­um of African Amer­i­can His­to­ry and Cul­ture makes it a threat.”

“This is a polit­i­cal fight,” Blight said in his clos­ing remarks. “It needs a dec­la­ra­tion of war. Don­ald Trump declared war on us on March 27, 2025, in that ‘san­i­ty and truth’ exec­u­tive order. That’s a dec­la­ra­tion of war on what we do.”

Posted in