Town council: Mason statue to move to WHS

By: Antho­ny Zepperi 
Sep­tem­ber 11, 2020
Wind­sor Journal 

The Town Coun­cil on Mon­day vot­ed 5–4 to remove the 9‑foot-tall bronze stat­ue of Major John Mason from its place on the Pal­isa­do Green and relo­cate it to the Wind­sor His­tor­i­cal Soci­ety.  All five Demo­c­ra­t­ic coun­cil mem­bers vot­ed to remove the stat­ue, while all four Repub­li­cans want­ed it to remain where it is.

The Stat­ue of John Mason (above) that was van­dal­ized a few weeks ago, will be moved from the Pal­isa­do Green to the Wind­sor His­tor­i­cal Soci­ety after a coun­cil rul­ing this Mon­day. The cen­tu­ry old stat­ue had been van- dal­ized before, when some­one broke the bot­tom part of the sword. Pho­to by Antho­ny Zepperi

Mason, an Eng­lish set­tler, mili­tia leader, colo­nial gov­er­nor, and found­ing father of Wind­sor, head­ed the colo­nial forces dur­ing the 1637 war against the Pequots, that result­ed in the destruc­tion of what was then the most pow­er­ful Native Amer­i­can Tribe in the area.

Fol­low­ing attacks by the Pequots against a num­ber of Indi­ans and set­tlers, Mason forged an alliance with the Mohe­gans under Chief Uncas and togeth­er with the Nar­ra­ganset tribe they attacked a Pequot fort in Mys­tic, and mas­sa­cred the defend­ers — among them women and children.

Many mod­ern his­to­ri­ans con­sid­er this an act of geno­cide, since the attack, which caused the deaths of between 400 and 700 Pequot men, women, and chil­dren, near­ly took out the tribe. Fol­low­ing the bat­tle many of the defeat­ed Pequots were enslaved and sold into captivity.

Oth­er his­to­ri­ans point out that war at that time — and par­tic­u­lar­ly among Indi­an tribes — involved the mas­sacre of the oppo­nents and the enslav­ing of the sur­viv­ing ones and that Mason’s forces’ bru­tal­i­ty must be seen in that context.

While Mason is con­sid­ered one of the founders of Wind­sor, the stat­ue was orig­i­nal­ly erect­ed in Gro­ton in 1889, near the area where the con­tro­ver­sial bat­tle was fought. 

In 1992, a group peti­tioned to have it removed from what they saw as sacred ground. Oth­ers, among them Richard “Skip” Hay­ward, then the Mashan­tuck­et chair­man, want­ed the stat­ue to remain in Mys­tic, so that the mas­sacre would not be forgotten.

The state spent sev­er­al years work­ing to iden­ti­fy and evalu- ate sites for relo­ca­tion of the stat­ue, until in 1996, Wind­sor grant­ed the state a 50-year ease­ment that allowed the then-107- year-old stat­ue to be relo­cat­ed to the Pal­isa­do Green, which is close to Mason’s orig­i­nal 1630s home lot.

Dur­ing the Mon­day meet­ing. Agnes Pier, pres­i­dent of the Wind­sor His­tor­i­cal Soci­ety, said that the society’s board still has to vote on whether or not to accept the stat­ue, a deci­sion that would like­ly hap­pen at the board’s next meet­ing on Sept. 21.

Pier stressed that if and when the his­tor­i­cal soci­ety accepts the stat­ue, it will be dis­played with accom­pa­ny­ing infor­ma­tion about Mason and the role he played in history.

There’s a much larg­er sto­ry here that must be told, not just the side of the Pequots or the side of the colo­nials,” Pier said.

Accord­ing to Town Man­ag­er Peter Souza, the State Depart­ment of Ener­gy and Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion would be able to cov­er the cost of mov­ing the stat­ue but the cost of prepar­ing its new loca­tion is still undecided.

Repub­li­can Coun­cil­man Lenworth Walk­er, who vot­ed to keep the stat­ue where it is, said he did not see how Mason con­tributed to sys­temic racism in 2020.

Top­pling stat­ues is part of a nation­al par­ti­san polit­i­cal agen­da,” Walk­er said. Hes aid that instead of mov­ing the stat­ue, addi­tion­al sig­nage inform­ing vis­i­tors of the full scope of Mason’s actions should be added.

May­or Don Trinks, a Demo­c­rat, who worked to find a mid­dle ground between those who want­ed the stat­ued destroyed and those who want­ed it to remain in place (some of them descen­dants of Mason him­self) vot­ed to move the stat­ue and said the local his­tor­i­cal soci­ety would be able to pro­vide an objec­tive per­spec­tive on the stat­ue and on Mason him­self in an exhib­it fea­tur­ing him