Press Release:
Attorney General Tong Sues Trump Administration to Protect Scientific Research
Preceding Event:
On April 18, 2025, The National Science Foundation (NSF) began ending projects focused on increasing the participation of women, minorities and people with disabilities in STEM fields. Some of these projects included studies on misinformation and environmental justice. They also announced via email that they were was adopting new priorities. The directive sent out by the NSF said, “efforts to broaden participation in STEM should not preference some groups at the expense of others, or directly/indirectly exclude individuals or groups…research projects with more narrow impact limited to subgroups of people based on protected class or characteristics do not effectuate NSF priorities.” On May 2, 2025, NSF announced it was going to cap indirect spending costs associated with research — such as laboratory space, equipment, and facility services — at 15% across the board, millions of dollars from university research facilities. Similar rate caps at the Department of Energy and the National Institute of Health have been legally enjoined.
General Overview:
According to the press release from May 28, 2025, “Attorney General William Tong today joined a coalition of 15 other attorneys general in suing the Trump administration to stop its illegal attempts to cut critical National Science Foundation (NSF) programs and funding that help maintain the United States’ position as a global leader in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM).“
NSF has been an independent federal agency since its inception in 1950. NSF funded research at universities has helped the U.S. maintain a competitive edge in STEM. According to the press release, NSF has “a Congressionally-mandated focus on improving diversity in STEM fields. Congress has instructed in law that a ‘core strategy’ of NSF’s work must be to increase the participation of people who have historically been left out of STEM occupations.“
The suit alleges that the directive and the subsequent actions violate the Administrative Procedures Act and also go against the Constitution “by unlawfully changing NSF policy and ignoring Congress’s intent for how NSF should function,” according to the press release.
Connecticut Nexus:
According to the press release, “This includes tens of millions of dollars to Connecticut’s public universities for a broad array of groundbreaking research, including projects to improve storm prediction, grid resiliency, drought-resistant forest management, technological improvements to air traffic control and product delivery, support for minority students in STEM education and careers, and many more.”
Date of filing:
May 28, 2025
Case #:
Case title:
State of New York et al v. National Science Foundation et al
Plaintiffs: 16 states
- STATE OF NEW YORK;
- STATE OF HAWAIʻI;
- STATE OF CALIFORNIA;
- STATE OF COLORADO;
- STATE OF CONNECTICUT;
- STATE OF DELAWARE;
- STATE OF ILLINOIS;
- STATE OF MARYLAND;
- COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS;
- STATE OF NEVADA;
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY;
- STATE OF NEW MEXICO;
- STATE OF OREGON;
- STATE OF RHODE ISLAND;
- STATE OF WASHINGTON;
- STATE OF WISCONSIN
Defendants:
- NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION;
- BRIAN STONE, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the National Science Foundation
Court:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Status as of Dec. 1, 2025
CLOSED — Terminated on Aug. 25, 2025
Judgment against plaintiffs