My online reputation, as I expected, isn’t overly strong.
When I typed my name into Google, the results weren’t heartening. The top results were related to Jack Mitchell, the photographer, who was apparently a pretty big deal. For this reason, I would rate my online reputation as poor. Granted, most of my published Daily Campus articles, my Twitter handle and personal website show up at some point, but they aren’t nearly as high up as I would like.
I think my online reputation is poor because I’m not nearly as active as I should be. I’m a shy, reserved person by nature, and on the Internet, I am the classic lurker: I reap all of the Internet’s many rewards, and I contribute very little to it in return. This is largely a personal choice, but I do realize that I need to step my game up.
As a journalist, my digital footprint reflects about what you’d expect. If you, for some reason, took the time to trawl through the search results, you would at some point find that I do write, I have had my work published, that I have a portfolio online and that I use Twitter for professional purposes. In other words, I am a journalist in some form or another. But compared to my more active and prolific peers, I lag far behind in terms of output and presence.
I firmly believe that, online, you shouldn’t post anything you wouldn’t say out loud in public. Also, I think you need to keep it professional, especially as you get older. If you want people to trust you, you need to show them that you care about your work. Tweeting or posting inane ramblings laced with profanity accomplishes the exact opposite.
To a degree, that approach can be a double edged sword, especially in my experience. In some cases, I have been so cautious about tweeting or posting to Facebook that I just don’t do it at all. I think that explains my relatively small output online, and why I am hesitant to be an active social media user. The costs of making a mistake, as we discussed Tuesday, are higher than ever. The Internet doesn’t forget.
My New Responsibilities
When it comes to the idea of taking on a role as a moderator or conversation leader, I get excited. I am ready to add volume to my digital voice, and I think that I have a lot to offer in that realm.
I think that I have a lot of interesting things to say, ideas to share, people to meet, etc. Because I’m naturally a shy person, I do like having an excuse to engage with people, and journalism – and the fact that the industry is changing to favor bold, interesting and branded personalities – provides me with such an opportunity.
And, at the end of the day, if I’m uncomfortable with that role, I’m in the wrong business. To a degree, journalists have to lead the conversation. It just comes with the territory. I certainly don’t think it will be easy, but I am eager to challenge myself by becoming more of a presence, and putting my neck on the line when it comes to sharing opinions and expressing bold ideas to a large audience.