What the Larry Nassar Trial Says About Sexual Assault in Athletic Communities

The former Olympic gymnastics doctor was sentenced to up to 175 years behind bars, and the athletic community needs to learn from the scandal.

I just signed your death war­rant.” That’s what Judge Rose­marie Aquili­na said after sen­tenc­ing Lar­ry Nas­sar, the for­mer Olympic gym­nas­tics doc­tor, to 40 to 175 years in prison for sex­u­al­ly assault­ing over 150 young female ath­letes, includ­ing Olympic medal­ists McK­ay­la Maroney, Aly Rais­man and Simone Biles.

Nas­sar, who also worked as a doc­tor for the Michi­gan State Uni­ver­si­ty ath­let­ic teams, molest­ed girls as young as six years old and claimed he was per­form­ing “spe­cial treat­ment” on them. He used his author­i­ty to manip­u­late and coerce his vic­tims into sub­mis­sion and silence. “Lar­ry metic­u­lous­ly groomed me for the pur­pose of exploit­ing me for his own sex­u­al gain,” Rachael Den­hol­lan­der, the first women to pub­licly accuse the doc­tor, told Judge Aquilina.

This pat­tern of abuse can be traced all the way back to 1992 when Nas­sar was in med­ical school at Michi­gan State Uni­ver­si­ty. Nas­sar lured Den­hol­lan­der, then a teenag­er, to his apart­ment because he need­ed her to par­tic­i­pate in some “med­ical research he was doing and offered her a free full-body mas­sage as com­pen­sa­tion,” accord­ing to a fed­er­al lawsuit.

Flash-for­ward two years to 1994 when he start­ed to assault Olympic medal­ist Jamie Dantzsch­er, which would last for six years. How­ev­er, accord­ing to the law­suit that Dantzsch­er filed back in 2016, the USA Gym­nas­tic Orga­ni­za­tion knew about the abuse but “neg­li­gent­ly sup­pressed, con­cealed or failed to dis­close knowl­edge that Nas­sar had engaged in sex­u­al con­duct with team members.”

Because of the organization’s silence, over the next 20 years, many more par­ents would trust Nas­sar to treat their tal­ent­ed daugh­ters for the many ail­ments they would receive doing the sport they loved so much. And the abuse didn’t just stop at the Olympic team; Nas­sar con­tin­ued this abuse dur­ing his time at Michi­gan State University.

Michi­gan State Uni­ver­si­ty has also been accused of cov­er­ing up the years of sex­u­al abuse while Nas­sar worked there. “I report­ed it. Michi­gan State Uni­ver­si­ty, the school I loved and trust­ed, had the audac­i­ty to tell me that I did not under­stand the dif­fer­ence between sex­u­al assault and a med­ical pro­ce­dure,” Michi­gan State stu­dent Aman­da Thomashow said in front of the court and Nas­sar ear­li­er this week.

While the uni­ver­si­ty pres­i­dent, Lou Anna Simon, resigned ear­li­er this week after immense pres­sure from board mem­bers, that does lit­tle to make up for the years of neglect­ed abuse. How­ev­er, it did leave many fac­ul­ty and stu­dents at the uni­ver­si­ty talk­ing about sex­u­al assault on cam­pus. “To the sur­vivors of sex­u­al abuse at MSU…we stand with you in say­ing that the time is now for us to col­lec­tive­ly change and improve the over­all cul­ture and safe­ty and secu­ri­ty for every­one at Michi­gan State Uni­ver­si­ty,” Stu­dent Body Pres­i­dent Loren­zo San­tavic­ca said in a state­ment.

The NCAA also announced ear­li­er this week that they will be con­duct­ing an inves­ti­ga­tion at the uni­ver­si­ty due to their fail­ure to address the reports of abuse by Nas­sar. The USA Gym­nas­tics orga­ni­za­tion also announced the res­ig­na­tion of three top board mem­bers after the Unit­ed States Olympic Com­mit­tee demand­ed change from the top down. “Our posi­tion comes from a clear sense that USAG cul­ture needs fun­da­men­tal rebuild­ing,” said a let­ter writ­ten by the Olympic Committee.

In addi­tion, all staff and board mem­bers in the orga­ni­za­tion will now be required to com­plete Safe­S­port train­ing through the U.S. Cen­ter for Safe­S­port with­in the next three months and under­go ethics train­ing in the next six months.

While all of these changes are swift and pre­cise, will they actu­al­ly change any­thing in the ath­let­ic com­mu­ni­ty? These changes and res­ig­na­tions of top offi­cials are signs that the ath­let­ic com­mu­ni­ty is on the right track, but this sex­u­al assault case goes so much deep­er than the top officials.

The cul­ture of silence that was built around Nas­sar for more than two decades runs deep­er than many peo­ple acknowl­edge or are aware of, and that is where we need to start the repairs. While top offi­cials resign­ing sends a harsh mes­sage and sets a prece­dent for how sex­u­al abuse will be han­dled in the future, we must also look at the peo­ple clos­est to Nas­sar on the ground level.

This man was allowed access to young girls despite the warn­ing signs and he didn’t get that access by act­ing alone. One man that comes up in this con­ver­sa­tion is John Ged­dert, one of the top gym­nas­tics coach­es that worked along­side Nas­sar and one of his clos­est friends.

The gym­nasts he coached described Geddert’s coach­ing style as harsh and intim­i­dat­ing, which was the oppo­site of Nas­sar who seemed qui­et, calm­ing and even safe. Their oppo­site demeanors, how­ev­er, cre­at­ed an envi­ron­ment in which the girls felt unable to go to their own coach after being abused. “John and Lar­ry were like this per­fect storm,” Priscil­la Kintigh, one of the gym­nas­tics coached by Ged­dert, told ESPN. “You become so unap­proach­able that your own gym­nasts don’t feel com­fort­able telling you what’s going on…kids were ter­ri­fied of him.”

At Michi­gan State, at least 14 uni­ver­si­ty rep­re­sen­ta­tives, includ­ing train­ers, assis­tant coach­es and even a detec­tive, knew about Nas­sar sex­u­al­ly assault­ing women on cam­pus and did noth­ing in the 20 years he worked there. Eight women report­ed being assault­ing by the doc­tor, but still noth­ing was done. Nas­sar wasn’t fired, sus­pend­ed or even con­front­ed after those allegations.

One of those women, Laris­sa Boyce, was just 16 years old when she was assault­ed by Nas­sar in the 1990s after hurt­ing her back dur­ing a youth gym­nas­tics pro­gram at the uni­ver­si­ty. When she told the then MSU head gym­nas­tics coach, Kathie Klages, she was told it was just a mis­un­der­stand­ing. “She just couldn’t believe that was hap­pen­ing,” Boyce told The Detroit News. “She said I must be mis­un­der­stand­ing what was going on.”

Klages also went on to tell Boyce, “I can file this, but there are going to be seri­ous con­se­quences for you and Nas­sar.” Because Boyce didn’t want to get any­one in trou­ble, she remained silent all those years.

Now, maybe Klages hon­est­ly did not believe that Nas­sar was capa­ble of sex­u­al­ly assault­ing a teenage girl, but she should have at least tak­en her seri­ous­ly and report­ed the assault to the police.

This “don’t ask, don’t tell” men­tal­i­ty is preva­lent in all sex­u­al abuse cas­es, as many saw with the Har­vey Wein­stein abuse scan­dal, and it is used to silence women and the peo­ple they con­fide in. Nas­sar was a respect­ed man in the ath­let­ic com­mu­ni­ty who was trust­ed by hun­dreds of par­ents to take care of their chil­dren and their chil­dren trust­ed him to be a nice doc­tor that would help them.

It would be nice to think that this is the last time we hear about Nas­sar or any sex­u­al assault case, but that just sim­ply isn’t true. Sex­u­al assault will keep occur­ring if vic­tims are silenced and abusers are free to roam, but the 150 women who spoke about their ordeal at Nassar’s sen­tenc­ing prove that if women con­tin­ue to speak out about these injus­tices, we can start build­ing a new cul­ture that won’t let vic­tims be silent. They will hear them and, most impor­tant­ly, help them put their abusers in prison.

Let this sen­tence strike fear in any­one who thinks it is O.K. to hurt anoth­er per­son. Abusers, your time is up. The sur­vivors are here, stand­ing tall, and we are not going any­where,” Aly Rais­man said, stand­ing before Judge Aquili­na and Nassar.

The New Facebook Changes Will Take You Back to Simpler Times

In an effort to improve the site, the new Facebook changes are designed to increase user-to-user interaction and reduce the creepy feeling of being spied on.

Face­book just announced the new changes to its news­feed and it has many adver­tis­ers wor­ried. In a post, Face­book CEO Mark Zucker­berg announced on Jan. 11, that its users will now “see less pub­lic con­tent like posts from busi­ness­es, brands and media. And the pub­lic con­tent you see more will be held to that stan­dard.” So, what exact­ly are these new Face­book changes?

Well, on your news­feed, you will now see more posts from your friends and any groups you joined instead of adver­tise­ments from dif­fer­ent brands and media, in order to pro­mote “mean­ing­ful inter­ac­tions between peo­ple.” That sounds pret­ty nice, right?

Face­book is one of the world’s largest dis­trib­u­tors of news and online ads, which explains why your news­feed might be clut­tered with seem­ing­ly irrel­e­vant adver­tise­ments. It may be annoy­ing, but com­pa­nies are spend­ing a lot of mon­ey to get you to see their con­tent. A lot of mon­ey. Even though Face­book may seem like a reg­u­lar social media site, it gen­er­ates over $1 bil­lion per quar­ter in adver­tis­ing rev­enue, with its biggest spenders being Wal­mart, Ford and McDonald’s.

Zucker­berg is chang­ing Facebook’s News Feed.
Pho­to cred­it: Fortune

And these com­pa­nies do it ever so sub­tly too, so you prob­a­bly aren’t even aware that they are sell­ing you things in the first place. For exam­ple, they’ll spend about $1–$5 to put an adver­tise­ment in the side­bar — yes, that side­bar that nobody even looks at — or they’ll put out a dai­ly pro­mot­ed post that costs around $5 per 1,000 peo­ple direct­ly on your news­feed, which could include a short video or an eye-catch­ing picture.

Why would any com­pa­ny spend that type of mon­ey on a social media site where peo­ple either don’t pay atten­tion to the adver­tise­ments or just scroll through them with­out a sec­ond glance? Well, because Face­book has over 1.2 bil­lion active users every month who are con­stant­ly check­ing Face­book, so that is a huge tar­get audience.

With that big of an audi­ence, com­pa­nies can grow their brand aware­ness and make a lot of mon­ey in the process. The com­put­er com­pa­ny Dell has made more than $9 mil­lion in Face­book adver­tis­ing and Nes­tle has over 5 mil­lion likes on Face­book. Those are pret­ty insane num­bers for a social media site that was start­ed in a Har­vard dorm room.

While the new Face­book changes may have wor­ried some adver­tis­ers, com­pa­nies shouldn’t wor­ry too much about this update. Since, at its core, the shift is con­cerned with gen­er­at­ing more “mean­ing­ful social inter­ac­tions,” com­pa­nies were going to have to rethink how they were going to inter­act with con­sumers any­way; now they have the com­fort of know­ing that the adver­tis­ing isn’t going away, it’s just chang­ing its appearance.

Facebook’s vice pres­i­dent of News Feed, Adam Mosseri, said in an inter­view with Stat­e­ch­ery, “So if you and I had a back and forth con­ver­sa­tion on a post from a Page, that would actu­al­ly count as a mean­ing­ful social inter­ac­tion.” So, Face­book isn’t try­ing to end all paid pro­mo­tion, they just want them to have more pur­pose than throw­ing an adver­tise­ment on your news­feed for no rea­son. More mean­ing­ful posts will get favored in the News Feed and com­pa­ny posts that aren’t get­ting a lot of traf­fic won’t be in the News Feed.

The new Face­book changes not only affect adver­tis­ers, but also polit­i­cal cam­paignsbecause now their videos will show up less on the News Feed, unless they pay for spon­sored posts. Polit­i­cal par­ties might be forced to change how they per­form social media cam­paigns and how much mon­ey they spend on dig­i­tal advertisements.

But, again, politi­cians should look at these changes as a way to engage with their audi­ence instead of spew­ing infor­ma­tion at them. “Politi­cians will have to spend more time engag­ing with peo­ple, rather than engag­ing at them,” said Dean Tester, a dig­i­tal media strate­gist for con­ser­v­a­tive politicians.

Politi­cians can use this oppor­tu­ni­ty to con­nect with their audi­ence by doing live videos, cre­at­ing their own Face­book pages, inter­act­ing with their sup­port­ers via Mes­sen­ger or engag­ing read­ers in the com­ment sec­tion of a post.

What the New Face­book Changes Mean for Users

These changes are poten­tial­ly great for the every­day users because Face­book is going back to its roots. Before the social media site became a leader in the realm, Face­book was just a sim­ple social net­work­ing site. Peo­ple could go on, make a pro­file, talk to friends and post pic­tures to show their clos­est friends. It was sim­ple and that was the charm.

You could safe­ly go on Face­book with­out being slammed with adver­tise­ments on your feed. You could actu­al­ly see posts that you want­ed to see, such as your long-lost high school friend get­ting mar­ried, your fam­i­ly mem­bers post­ing pic­tures from the hol­i­days or your friend com­ment­ing some­thing sil­ly on your wall to cre­ate a back and forth.

It was inter­ac­tive and fun to go on Face­book instead of what it is like today. When peo­ple go on Face­book today, it is like they become zom­bies with mean­ing­less adver­tise­ments every­where. You prob­a­bly have to scroll through about five adver­tise­ments before you can see a post from some­one you actu­al­ly know.

Per­haps these new Face­book changes will min­i­mize the zom­bie-like behav­ior and force peo­ple to revert back to their old Face­book ways of fight­ing in the com­ment sec­tion, writ­ing obscene things on peo­ple walls and gen­er­at­ing healthy debates on posts.

Why Aspiring Journalists Should See “The Post”

This true story about the Washington Post will have every college student changing their major.

Pic­ture it: Two elite news­pa­pers with huge nation­al influ­ence going head-to-head to report on one of the biggest scan­dals in Amer­i­can his­to­ry and fight to exer­cise their right of the First Amend­ment. Then, throw in pow­er­house actors Tom Han­ks and Meryl Streep direct­ed by Steven Spiel­berg. What do you get? “The Post,” a journalist’s dream movie about the 1971 pub­li­ca­tion of the top-secret infor­ma­tion in the Pen­ta­gon Papers pub­lished by the Wash­ing­ton Post (the Post).

The Pen­ta­gon Papers were a 47-vol­ume Depart­ment of Defense study on the Viet­nam War that exposed just how much lying and manip­u­la­tion the gov­ern­ment was using to deceive the Amer­i­can pub­lic about what was actu­al­ly going on in the war. While the New York Times already had pos­ses­sion of the Pen­ta­gon Papers and had writ­ten a series of arti­cles based on the study, the gov­ern­ment tem­porar­i­ly banned them from pub­lish­ing any fur­ther sto­ries about it.

While that wasn’t so good for the New York Times, the ban gave way for the Post to gain a small win­dow of time to jump on the sto­ry them­selves despite Pres­i­dent Nixon and his administration’s efforts to keep them from doing so.

 

In the film “The Post,” Han­ks plays the brusque and bril­liant Post exec­u­tive edi­tor Ben Bradlee and Streep por­trays the strong-willed, and now infa­mous, Post pub­lish­er Katharine Gra­ham. Togeth­er, they form an unstop­pable team to get ahold of and pub­lish the whop­ping 3,000 pages that would not only change America’s view on the Pres­i­den­cy and the nature of the Viet­nam War, but also how news­pa­pers could pub­lish clas­si­fied mate­ri­als even when they went against our government.

The Post” is a great film for any­body to go see if they want a lit­tle his­to­ry les­son on the Viet­nam War and the Pen­ta­gon Papers, if they love Tom Han­ks and Meryl Streep (which is basi­cal­ly every­body) or just love a good ole fash­ioned dra­ma about the cor­rup­tion of Amer­i­can pol­i­tics. How­ev­er, it is a cru­cial movie for any aspir­ing jour­nal­ist to go see right now just like many oth­er jour­nal­ism films that came before it, such as “Spot­light” and “All the President’s Men.”

Why you ask? Because it shows how deter­mi­na­tion, good jour­nal­is­tic skills and fight­ing for what you believe in as a jour­nal­ist are cru­cial in keep­ing the press’s First Amend­ment right to expose the truth at any cost. Despite all of the government’s efforts to keep the Pen­ta­gon Papers out of the press, the team at the Wash­ing­ton Post didn’t lis­ten and didn’t give in, so they could deliv­er the truth to the people.

First off, this is por­trayed with impec­ca­ble taste by Meryl Streep. Streep’s char­ac­ter, Katharine Gra­ham, gains con­trol over the news­pa­per after the death of her hus­band and is seen by many as some­one who only fol­lows the orders of the men in the news­room. As the film goes on, how­ev­er, the deci­sion to pub­lish the papers lies on her shoul­ders and she trans­forms from a demure socialite to a hard-nosed news­woman. Streep’s por­tray­al of Gra­ham not only shows the strength and deter­mi­na­tion you need to have as a reporter, but also the willpow­er it takes to make a tough deci­sion for the bet­ter­ment of your readers.

And Tom Han­ks’ char­ac­ter, Ben Bradlee, doesn’t shy away from the fight against the Nixon-led gov­ern­ment either. Bradlee is exact­ly what an edi­tor should be, which is deci­sive, brave and inspir­ing to his team of writ­ers and aspir­ing edi­tors should take note if you want to make it as an edi­tor at any pub­li­ca­tion, print or online.

‘The Post’ film poster.
Pho­to cred­it: Teas­er Trailer

Both Bradlee and Gra­ham show the heart and ruth­less deter­mi­na­tion that they need­ed to beat their rival paper to fin­ish pub­lish­ing the most con­tro­ver­sial and shock­ing doc­u­ments the coun­try has ever seen. And, to top it off, they are doing it while also set­ting a prece­dent that has allowed every gen­er­a­tion of jour­nal­ists that have come after them the free­dom to go against the gov­ern­ment and the sta­tus quo for the bet­ter­ment of society.

With­out the events in this movie, the events in “All the President’s Men” and “Spot­light” would not have tak­en place. With­out the courage of Bradlee and Gra­ham, the Post’s very own reporters, Carl Bern­stein and Bob Wood­ward, nev­er would have had the back­ing to expose the Water­gate scan­dal, which only came a year later.

Fast for­ward about 30 years and the Spot­light team at the Boston Globe who uncov­ered the sex­u­al abuse in the Catholic Church. While it was extreme­ly dif­fi­cult for them to get sur­vivors and church offi­cials to talk, they had the full back­ing of the news­pa­per and they didn’t have the nation­al gov­ern­ment breath­ing down their necks.

The con­tro­ver­sy sur­round­ing the pub­lish­ing of the Pen­ta­gon Papers ruf­fles everybody’s feath­ers all the way up to the top of the gov­ern­ment food chain and legal action was tak­en. While The New York Times man­aged to pub­lish a few of the papers, the Depart­ment of Jus­tice issues a tem­po­rary restrain­ing order against any fur­ther pub­li­ca­tion. Why? Because it was seen as harm­ful to nation­al secu­ri­ty, which is just gov­ern­ment code for: “We don’t want peo­ple to see how bad­ly we messed up.”

Now, of course, the Times and the Wash­ing­ton Post had to fight back, which is chron­i­cled in the movie. In the famous case of New York Times Co. v. Unit­ed States, the Times and the Wash­ing­ton Post teamed up and the Supreme Court ruled that the gov­ern­ment failed to prove harm to nation­al secu­ri­ty, and the pub­li­ca­tion of the papers was legal under the First Amendment’s pro­tec­tion of free­dom of the press.

After that rul­ing, every news­pa­per in the coun­try was allowed to pub­lish the por­tions that the Times had not already pub­lished. That includ­ed how numer­ous Pres­i­dents, from Tru­man to Nixon, had all mis­led the pub­lic about the degree of America’s involve­ment in the war.

While these papers came out at a time when Amer­i­cans were already skep­ti­cal about the war, the Supreme Court took the press’ side and gave them the pow­er to decide what to pub­lish with lit­tle gov­ern­ment influ­ence as long as it’s crit­i­cal to pub­lic opin­ion. Imag­ine liv­ing in a soci­ety where the press doesn’t get the free­dom to speak out against the gov­ern­ment and put them in line when they mess up on such a high lev­el. With­out the pub­lish­ing of the Pen­ta­gon Papers and with­out the courage and great jour­nal­is­tic skills of the not only the team at the Wash­ing­ton Post, but also at the Times, we wouldn’t have that free­dom today.

The 9 Worst Cities for College Graduates to Live

Graduation season is just around the corner, so you are going to want to steer clear of these cities.

Right now, as you are read­ing this arti­cle, you’re prob­a­bly think­ing: I have plen­ty of time to think about post-grad­u­a­tion job search­ing, so why should I even both­er read­ing this? Well, no offense, but that line of think­ing is wrong. It’s nev­er too ear­ly to start think­ing about where you want to live after the end of your col­lege career and what full-time career you want to go into.

There are plen­ty of cities that prob­a­bly come to your mind when you think of post-grad­u­a­tion life. Boston, New York City, Wash­ing­ton D.C., Dal­las, San Fran­cis­co, Los Ange­les and plen­ty more cities prob­a­bly come up on your dream list of places to live after you walk across the stage at grad­u­a­tion. How­ev­er, some of those cities that were just list­ed are one of the worst places for col­lege grad­u­ates to live. So, con­tin­ue read­ing and find out which nine cities you should prob­a­bly avoid while job searching.

Cities with the least afford­able housing:

When you grad­u­ate col­lege, you prob­a­bly won’t have a high pay­ing job, at least not yet. On top of that, you have to fac­tor in loan pay­ments, car pay­ments, insur­ance and mon­ey for day-to-day liv­ing such as gro­ceries, elec­tric­i­ty, month­ly Net­flix pay­ments and more. So, you’re going to want to look at cities with afford­able hous­ing that won’t gob­ble up most of your pay­check. Here are three cities with the least afford­able hous­ing in the Unit­ed States.

Orange Coun­ty, Cal­i­for­nia. Do you remem­ber the show, “The OC?” The teen dra­ma set in the lav­ish town of Orange Coun­ty, Calif. that dom­i­nat­ed tween tele­vi­sion in the ear­ly 2000s? Well, if you were think­ing of liv­ing in the actu­al Orange Coun­ty, think again. The per­cent­age of your aver­age week­ly income required to pay for a medi­an-priced home is 80.9 per­cent. So, per­haps you should hold off on your dream of liv­ing like Mis­cha Bar­ton, unless you man­age to have about three or four room­mates to help pay for your nice, beach­front apartment.

Sono­ma, Cal­i­for­nia. If you love wine, this one is going to sting just a lit­tle bit. Sono­ma is most­ly known for its vast array of winer­ies and beau­ti­ful moun­tain scenery, but, as you guessed, it’s super pri­cy to live there. You would need to dole out 1 per­cent of your week­ly income to live in this scenic Cal­i­for­nia town. So, what exact­ly could you live in if you still chose to move to the wine coun­try? Well, a sim­ple search on Zillow.com shows that you can’t find an apart­ment to rent for less than $1,500 a month, and that’s only for a small, one bed­room apart­ment. You might as well just live on cam­pus for anoth­er year or stay in that over­priced on-cam­pus apart­ment you have now.

New York City, New York. It’s no shock that the bustling New York City would be make the list of least afford­able places to live. Not only is it expen­sive to live there, with 4 per­cent of your pay­check going towards hous­ing, but it’s also expen­sive to do just about any­thing in New York. Want to see a movie? That will cost you around $15. Grab a meal with your friends? That’ll cost you around $48, while the nation­al aver­age is around $40. Sure, you could prob­a­bly make it work depend­ing on how much you make at your first job, but you might end up get­ting stuck in a stu­dio apart­ment with about five oth­er people.

Cities with the slow­est job growth:

When you’re apply­ing for a job, you’re going to want to look at job growth because, well, you’re going to want to live some­where with actu­al jobs. A slow job growth rate means that the city isn’t pro­duc­ing new jobs at a high rate, so there’s less of a chance of you get­ting a job there. Here are the three cities with the slow­est job growth.

Shreve­port, Lou­sian­na. When most peo­ple think Louisiana, they most­ly just think of New Orleans and not Shreve­port. Well, that might be for a good rea­son. The third largest city in the state actu­al­ly has a neg­a­tive per­cent of job growth. It has ‑0.24 per­cent recent job growth, which means that’s its los­ing more jobs than its gain­ing. That’s a pret­ty scary thought for any senior about to grad­u­ate col­lege and look for jobs.

Lub­bock, Texas While Lub­bock is known as “Hub City” with its high ener­gy, col­le­giate crowd from two uni­ver­si­ties and numer­ous fes­ti­vals, it has a low job growth of 0.86 per­cent com­pared to the 1.59 per­cent nation­al aver­age. While this city would be fun for a recent grad­u­ate to live in, the low job growth rate doesn’t show that a col­lege grad­u­ate would have a lot of job oppor­tu­ni­ties here.

Augus­ta, Geor­gia. Oh, Augus­ta, home of the Mas­ters golf tour­na­ment every year, sun­shine all year round and enough Ralph Lau­ren polos to make any fra­ter­ni­ty broth­er eter­nal­ly hap­py rid­ing around in a golf cart with a Bud Light in hand. What’s the down­side you ask? Its job growth in 2016 alone was just 2.1 per­cent with an annu­al pro­ject­ed job growth of 1.1 per­cent. Yikes. That’s pret­ty low com­pared to River­side, Calif. with the fastest job growth rate of 3.40 per­cent. While Augus­ta is a beau­ti­ful town to vis­it, with such a low pro­ject­ed job growth rate, it def­i­nite­ly doesn’t seem like a boom­ing city that a recent col­lege grad­u­ate should live in.

Cities with the low­est aver­age salary:

This is prob­a­bly the most impor­tant cat­e­go­ry when you’re look­ing for a pos­si­ble new home post-grad­u­a­tion. Salary is what you live off of, so if you have a salary on the small­er size, that’s going to make pay­ing off stu­dent loans, pay­ing month­ly rent and pay­ing for fun activ­i­ties like con­certs and a night out at the local bar a lit­tle dif­fi­cult. So, here are three cities to steer clear of if you want a (semi) big paycheck.

San­ta Ana, Cal­i­for­nia. With its famous New­port Beach and Hunt­ing­ton Beach and a live­ly, young scene with numer­ous col­leges in the area, San­ta Ana would def­i­nite­ly pro­vide a lot of fun enter­tain­ment for a recent col­lege grad­u­ate. How­ev­er, with an aver­age salary of $49,184 and the aver­age apart­ment cost­ing $1,307 to rent a month, a mil­len­ni­al wouldn’t have much mon­ey left over to par­tic­i­pate in those fun activities.

Ana­heim, Cal­i­for­nia. While Ana­heim has the eighth largest econ­o­my in the U.S., thanks to Dis­ney­land bring­ing in almost 18 mil­lion peo­ple in 2016, it’s home to one of the low­est aver­age salaries in the nation. The city’s aver­age salary is $49,353, which might seem like a pret­ty large pay­check to col­lege grad­u­ates who have only earned min­i­mum wage for the last four years. How­ev­er, when you fac­tor in an aver­age apart­ment cost­ing a whop­ping $1,362 a month to rent, that salary isn’t going to go very far. So, while yes, it would be awe­some to live and work in the same city as Dis­ney­land, it isn’t worth it with that low of an aver­age salary and a high cost of living.

Irvine, Cal­i­for­nia. Are you sens­ing a pat­tern yet? Yes, the city with third low­est aver­age salary is, again, in Cal­i­for­nia. While the aver­age salary is much high­er than the pre­vi­ous two cities at $68,942, the cost of liv­ing is also high­er. A stu­dio bed­room, on aver­age, will cost you a heart stop­ping $1,350 a month, which is $638 more than the nation­al aver­age. And if you’re feel­ing a lit­tle extrav­a­gant, you could upgrade to a one-bed­room apart­ment, cost­ing you $1,641 a month. Do you even want to know what that is com­pared to the nation­al aver­age? Well, it’s $816 more a month. So, while you would get paid more mon­ey to work in Irvine, you would also have to spend a lot more mon­ey to just have a roof over your head.

Is Quitting the Best Response to Pay Inequality?

E! News Anchor Catt Sadler quit after learning she got paid significantly less than her male counter-part, but was it the right call?

Catt Sadler, the long­time E! News host quit after learn­ing that her male co-host, Jason Kennedy, was being paid close to dou­ble her salary. While Sadler and her team repeat­ed­ly asked to rene­go­ti­ate her con­tract to get a high­er pay, they were turned down mul­ti­ple times.

My team and I asked for what I know I deserve and were denied repeat­ed­ly,” Sadler wrote on her per­son­al blog, The Catt Walk.

Sadler has worked at E! News since 2006 and this year, her con­tract was com­ing to an end, but net­work exec­u­tives did tell her that they want­ed to extend her deal. It was dur­ing these nego­ti­a­tions, that she was informed that Kennedy was being paid more than her even though she believed they did essen­tial­ly the same job.

One of Sadler’s rep­re­sen­ta­tives told Peo­ple Mag­a­zine, “their roles at the net­work were vir­tu­al­ly iden­ti­cal. The only thing about them that was not com­pa­ra­ble was their gen­der – and the fact that she filmed a min­i­mum of sev­en shows a week to his five.”

Both Sadler and Kennedy had joined E! News around the same time as each oth­er, both work­ing their way up to anchors of the pro­gram. Sadler had recent­ly picked up more work by host­ing a two-hour live day­time show called “Dai­ly Pop” on the net­work. That, along­side co-host­ing the evening series on the net­work, added more respon­si­bil­i­ty and hours for Sadler.

Kennedy also does his fair share by co-host­ing the evening series, cor­re­spond­ing for the network’s red car­pet cov­er­age and host­ing the week­end series, E! News Weekend.

While Sadler believed that her and Kennedy had com­pa­ra­ble work, the net­work didn’t agree, as dis­played in their state­ment, “Catt and Jason’s roles were not comparable.”

Sadler did not want to leave the job that she loved so much, but she felt that she could not remain silent on the issue. “How can I oper­ate with integri­ty and stay on at E if they’re not will­ing to pay me the same as him? Or at least come close? How can I accept an offer that shows they do not val­ue my con­tri­bu­tions and par­al­leled ded­i­ca­tion all these years?” Sadler wrote on The Catt Walk.

Sadler con­tin­ued to write in her blog post about oth­er “brave women” that have come before her. “Females refuse to remain silent on issues that mat­ter most because with­out our voic­es, how will we invoke last­ing change? How can we make it bet­ter for the next gen­er­a­tion of girls if we do not stand for what is fair and just today?” Sadler asked of her readers.

The gen­der pay gap issue

While the gen­der pay gap has nar­rowed since the 1970s, which in part was due to women’s progress in edu­ca­tion and work­force par­tic­i­pa­tion,  the medi­an salary for women work­ing full-time remains at close to 80 per­cent of men’s. Now, this pay gap does depend on var­i­ous things such as job, hours worked and edu­ca­tion lev­el to name a few.

The pay gap also varies across dif­fer­ent racial back­grounds and ages. For exam­ple, accord­ing to the Amer­i­can Asso­ci­a­tion of Uni­ver­si­ty Women, Amer­i­can Indi­an and Alas­ka Native women are paid 57 cents for every dol­lar a white man makes, and for Native Hawai­ian and oth­er women from the Pacif­ic Islands, that num­ber is slight­ly high­er at 59 cents. For Lati­na women, they get paid 54 per­cent of what men make, which means that it would take them a whole year of full-time work to get paid what the aver­age white male makes. For black women, that per­cent­age is raised just a lit­tle bit at 63 percent.

Those are pret­ty big dif­fer­ences across racial back­grounds, and it also depends heav­i­ly on age. The gen­der pay gap only increas­es with age as women in their 20s earn­ing 96 per­cent of what men are paid and women in their 50s mak­ing 78 or 89 per­cent. That num­ber shrinks even more once a woman reach­es her mid 50s and ear­ly 60s, down to 74 percent.

Sadler is not the only female celebri­ty to speak out

While the pay gap is felt by many dif­fer­ent women across many dif­fer­ent eth­nic back­grounds, ages, edu­ca­tion lev­el and more, women oth­er than Sadler has been speak­ing out in Hollywood.

In 2015, Char­l­ize Theron also suc­cess­ful­ly rene­go­ti­at­ed her con­tract for the “Snow White and the Hunts­man” sequel for high­er pay after the Sony hack revealed that she wasn’t being paid as much as her male co-star Chris Hemsworth. Nego­ti­a­tions worked in Theron’s favor and she got a $10 mil­lion worth deal, the same as Hemsworth. How­ev­er, it was a lit­tle eas­i­er for Theron, who said that once she asked, she sim­ply just got more pay. In an inter­view for “Elle,” Theron recalled the rene­go­ti­a­tion, “I have to give them cred­it because once I asked, they said yes. They did not fight it. And maybe that’s the mes­sage: That we just need to put our foot down.” Theron’s sto­ry, though much dif­fer­ent from Sandler’s, does high­light the need for more women to put their foot down and stand up for their right to equal pay, even it takes a lit­tle longer.

Char­l­ize Theron is anoth­er female celebri­ty who spoke up about the pay­ment gap between gen­der in the Unit­ed States. Pho­to cred­it: The Hol­ly­wood Reporter

That’s exact­ly what five mem­bers of the Unit­ed States women’s soc­cer team did in 2016 after learn­ing that they were being paid 40 per­cent less than their male coun­ter­parts on the nation­al team. While the women get a base salary of $72,000 a year, the men are paid dif­fer­ing amounts depend­ing on the type of game and how well they per­form. If the men’s team wins a game, each play­er gets $9,375 for a win. Even if they don’t, they still receive $6,250 for a tie and $5,000 for a loss. A play­er for the women’s team, gets $1,350 for a win and noth­ing for a tie or loss.

If a men’s play­er gets on the World Cup team, which is basi­cal­ly the Olympics for soc­cer, he will get a bonus of $68,750, while a female play­er gets $15,000 and that’s the only bonus they get. If the men’s team qual­i­fies in the World Cup, each play­er gets an extra $12,500 for a win, $6,000 for a tie and $4,000 for a loss. The women’s team gets noth­ing. This means that while the women make $75,000 each for a World Cup win, the men make $335,000 each. It also means that even if the men lose, they still get paid more money.

Upon learn­ing this, Hope Solo, Alex Mor­gan, Megan Rapi­noe, Becky Sauer­brunn and Car­li Lloyd filed an action with the Equal Employ­ment Oppor­tu­ni­ty Com­mis­sion, cit­ing wage dis­crim­i­na­tion. It took an entire year of fight­ing for the women to nego­ti­ate a dif­fer­ent con­tract with the U.S. Soc­cer Fed­er­a­tion. The catch? The women still didn’t get equal pay, but they got a 30 per­cent increase in base pay and bet­ter bonus­es for indi­vid­ual games.

So, is quit­ting always the answer?

Quit­ting is def­i­nite­ly not always the answer, which can be seen in Theron’s case and Unit­ed States Women’s Soc­cer team’s fight. There are always oth­er ways for women to get equal pay such as nego­ti­a­tions or tak­ing legal action.

Women should know their worth and nego­ti­ate for it. Just a sim­ple Google search can show you how much you should be mak­ing based on your job title and the state in which you live in. Once you have a base of what you should be mak­ing, you should defend your right to earn that amount. By nego­ti­at­ing your salary, you are putting your­self out there to your employ­er, which can be scary, but worthwhile.

In extreme cas­es, such as that of Sadler’s, nego­ti­a­tions may not work out, so the only course of action she saw fit was quit­ting. Her action, how­ev­er, meant more than just leav­ing an under­pay­ing job in search of one with prop­er salary. She brought the issue of gen­der gap in pay­ment to pub­lic and turned her­self into a voice for bet­ter equal­i­ty at work place. Com­pa­nies have to take respon­si­bil­i­ty for what they pay their work­ers and mon­i­tor gen­der-based pay dif­fer­ences by means such as audit­ing. Or, they can sim­ply imple­ment pay trans­paren­cy so every­one can know what their col­leagues are earn­ing. These sim­ple actions will cre­ate a work cul­ture where salaries aren’t being hid­den like a dirty secret and work­ers can know that they work for a com­pa­ny that sup­ports them.

Quit­ting, though some­times nec­es­sary, isn’t always the best option in the fight against the gen­der wage gap. Instead, women should be doing their research and keep­ing up with leg­is­la­tion that affects the wage gap. The more you know about this issue, the bet­ter equipped you can be at tack­ling it head on.

Is Indivior’s New Drug a Game Changer For the Opioid Addiction Epidemic?

Indivior’s newly developed drug, Sublocade, may reshape the battle against opioid addiction.

Ear­li­er this month, the U.S. Food and Drug Admin­is­tra­tion approved Indivior’s exper­i­men­tal drug for pub­lic use in an attempt to fight America’s grow­ing opi­oid addic­tion issue. The Lon­don-based com­pa­ny, which spe­cial­izes in addic­tion treat­ment, cre­at­ed Sublo­cade, the first injectable drug for patients who are recov­er­ing from addic­tion to hero­in, pre­scrip­tion painkillers and oth­er opi­oids. With one injec­tion a month admin­is­tered by a health­care pro­fes­sion­al, the drug has the poten­tial to reduce abuse and relaps­es after patients stop tak­ing their cur­rent medication.

Accord­ing to an arti­cle by Newsweek, the drug was approved fol­low­ing two clin­i­cal stud­ies that includ­ed more than eight hun­dred adults who suf­fered from mod­er­ate-to-severe opi­oid use dis­or­der. The results revealed that those “who were inject­ed with Sublo­cade passed more urine tests and self-report­ed less drug opi­oid use dur­ing a six-month peri­od, com­pared to the place­bo group.”

This approval came at a good time as Amer­i­ca is expe­ri­enc­ing one of the dead­liest drug epi­demics in its his­to­ry. Accord­ing to ABC News, more than six­ty-four thou­sand Amer­i­cans died from drug over­dos­es last year, most of which involved opi­oids. How­ev­er, just how effec­tive will this drug be, and most impor­tant­ly, could it be the drug to help end the opi­oid cri­sis in America?

What are opioids?

Opi­oid med­ica­tions are clas­si­fied by the FDA as, “pow­er­ful pain-reduc­ing med­ica­tions that include pre­scrip­tion oxy­codone, hydrocodone and mor­phine, among oth­ers, and have both ben­e­fits as well as poten­tial­ly seri­ous risks.” They are main­ly giv­en to peo­ple to help soothe bod­i­ly pain after surgery or seri­ous injury. When tak­en prop­er­ly, these med­ica­tions can help man­age a patient’s pain, but when abused or mis­used, they can cause seri­ous harm.

Opi­oids impact opi­oid recep­tors in the spinal cord and brain to decrease the inten­si­ty of the pain peo­ple are feel­ing, accord­ing to the Nation­al Insti­tute on Drug Abuse. In addi­tion, it increas­es the amount of dopamine, which is a neu­ro­trans­mit­ter that caus­es eupho­ria, or intense plea­sure. Dopamine gets released into the lim­bic sys­tem that hous­es the brain’s reward cir­cuit, so our brain gets trained that the feel­ing we get from opi­oids is a good thing. This is why peo­ple can become so addict­ed to opi­oid med­ica­tion very quick­ly, even if they take the appro­pri­ate amount, their brain basi­cal­ly rewards them for tak­ing it.

Even though opi­oids are addic­tive, they are legal, so many doc­tors still pre­scribe them to patients who are in pain after an injury or surgery. Accord­ing to the U.S. Depart­ment of Jus­tice Drug Enforce­ment Admin­is­tra­tion, between 2006 and 2014, the most wide­ly pre­scribed opi­oid was Vicodin. In 2014 alone, 7.8 bil­lion Vicodin pills were dis­trib­uted in Amer­i­ca, quite an increase from the num­ber of 6.4 bil­lion dis­persed in 2016.

Doc­tors are start­ing to say no to opi­oids when try­ing to pre­scribe a pill for patients who have acute pain, which is pain that won’t last after a patient’s recov­ery from an injury or surgery. How­ev­er, the under­ly­ing issue at hand is the fact that there is a lim­it­ed sci­en­tif­ic direc­tion for doc­tors to fol­low while treat­ing chron­ic pain, which is pain that will nev­er go away, such as back pain and fibromyal­gia. Accord­ing to a study con­duct­ed by a Nation­al Insti­tute of Health expert pan­el, pre­scrip­tion of opi­oid med­ica­tion to treat chron­ic pain has increased dra­mat­i­cal­ly, but there’s lit­tle guid­ance on how to actu­al­ly use opioids.

Because there are no oth­er drug options to help peo­ple with chron­ic pain, doc­tors still pre­scribe patients pain med­ica­tion in hopes that it will at least make them feel more com­fort­able. This log­ic, cou­pled with the harm­ful effects of opi­oid med­ica­tion, have made many Amer­i­cans depen­dent on the drug to help soothe their pain, and once they have some of it, they need to keep tak­ing it, which has led to our cur­rent opi­oid crisis.

So, what is the opi­oid epidemic?

The opi­oid epi­dem­ic is not only the issue of addic­tion to opi­oid med­ica­tion, it’s also the issue of mis­use, abuse and sub­se­quent dead­ly over­dose cri­sis in Amer­i­ca. Every sin­gle day, more than nine­ty Amer­i­cans die after over­dos­ing on opi­oids and it is only get­ting worse.

The ori­gin of this cri­sis can be traced back more than twen­ty years to the 1990s when Pur­due Phar­ma, a big phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­pa­ny, intro­duced Oxy­Con­tin into the mar­ket. Oxy­Con­tin is a long-act­ing ver­sion of oxy­codone that slow­ly releas­es the drug over twelve hours. It was hailed as a major break­through in sci­ence because of its slow release and all-day com­fort to patients and gen­er­at­ed close to $35 bil­lion in rev­enue for the company.

The prob­lem? The harm­ful, sole ingre­di­ent oxy­codone, which is sim­i­lar to hero­in and up to twice as strong as mor­phine. That’s pret­ty pow­er­ful, which is why many doc­tors at the time were hes­i­tant to pre­scribe it. Pur­due Phar­ma found a way around those timid notions by fund­ing their own research so their doc­tors could claim that the drug was not addic­tive and com­plete­ly safe.

Oxy­Con­tin did help many patients with their intense pain, but many also became hooked on the drug, and by 1999, two hun­dred thou­sand Amer­i­cans died from Oxy­Con­tin over­dos­es and oth­er pre­scrip­tion opioids.

Fast for­ward to this past Octo­ber, Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump declared the opi­oid epi­dem­ic a “nation­al pub­lic health emer­gency.” Trump went on to say that, “’Nobody has seen any­thing like what is going on now,” accord­ing to CNN.

Today, about a thou­sand peo­ple die every week from drug abus­es and two-thirds of those deaths are from opi­oid over­dos­es. It’s no won­der the opi­oid epi­dem­ic is now being regard­ed as the worst pub­lic health cri­sis in Amer­i­can his­to­ry, affect­ing peo­ple of all races, ages and eco­nom­ic stand­ing. The hard­est hit demo­graph­ic, how­ev­er, is white peo­ple and Native Amer­i­cans, which is a shift from pre­vi­ous drug epi­demics. Accord­ing to PBS, opi­oid deaths among white Amer­i­cans in 2014 was 7.9 deaths per one hun­dred thou­sand peo­ple, com­pared to 3.3 deaths per the same num­ber for black Amer­i­cans. The rate was even high­er amongst Native Amer­i­cans with 8.4 deaths.

Fur­ther­more, accord­ing to the same PBS arti­cle, peo­ple between the age of forty-five and fifty-four are more like­ly to die by opi­oids than any oth­er age group, with a whop­ping 11.7 deaths per one hun­dred thou­sand peo­ple. In com­par­i­son, mil­len­ni­als, peo­ple between the ages of fif­teen and twen­ty-four, had a rate of 3.1 deaths. These sta­tis­tics are scar­ing many civil­ians, gov­ern­ment offi­cials and med­ical professionals.

How Sublo­cade will affect the opi­oid cri­sis in America

Sublo­cade is the first injectable form of an old opi­oid addic­tion drug called buprenor­phine, com­mon­ly giv­en to recov­er­ing opi­oid addicts. Buprenor­phine pro­duces the same effects as opi­oids, such as eupho­ria, but start­ing at a low­er inten­si­ty and grad­u­al­ly increas­ing with each dose until they lev­el off. Due to this mech­a­nism, it low­ers the risk of mis­use, depen­den­cy and side effects.

‘Sublo­cade is a bet­ter solu­tion because it has to be inject­ed by a health­care pro­fes­sion­al instead of a pill or strips that are sent home.’ Pho­to cred­it: Healthline

The issue with buprenor­phine is that it is pop­u­lar­ly sold on the black mar­ket. Sublo­cade is a bet­ter solu­tion because it has to be inject­ed by a health care pro­fes­sion­al instead of a pill or strips that are sent home, so peo­ple can’t sell it on the black mar­ket. Once the drug is inject­ed, it trans­forms into a sol­id mass that dis­solves slow­ly over a month. So, instead of recov­er­ing addicts tak­ing the buprenor­phine pill once a day, they can get this injec­tion once a month, which will hope­ful­ly reduce relapse.

Accord­ing to an FDA state­ment, fol­low­ing the two clin­i­cal stud­ies on the drug, a high num­ber of patients on Sublo­cade had “no evi­dence of illic­it opi­oid use through­out the treat­ment peri­od.” These results are promis­ing to many peo­ple both in and out of the med­ical field.

It’s poten­tial­ly a game chang­er,” Dr. Andrew Kolod­ny, co-direc­tor of opi­oid pol­i­cy research at Bran­deis Uni­veristy, told Busi­ness Insid­er. “This could become first-line [med­ica­tion] for opi­oid addic­tion.” Mike Derkacz, CEO and pres­i­dent of Brae­burn Phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals, adds on the sub­ject, “This new tech­nol­o­gy has the poten­tial to great­ly influ­ence the way patients are treat­ed today…[It can] free patients from the dai­ly deci­sion and reminder of the dis­ease.” With­out the con­stant reminder of the addic­tion, patients can con­tin­ue to live their dai­ly lives and move for­ward with­out the con­stant need for opi­oid medication.

Sublo­cade has the poten­tial to help treat numer­ous Amer­i­cans who suf­fer from opi­oid addic­tion and the future of the opi­oid epi­dem­ic is final­ly a lit­tle more opti­mistic with this new drug on the market.

The Legend of Michigan State’s Bearded Man

MSU senior Braden Cleary is the co-founder of TheMountCo and creator of The Bearded Man Project, an initiative to bring attention to the waning popularity of America’s national parks.

What do you get when you com­bine a beard­ed man, a t‑shirt and your love of nature? You get The­Mount­Co, a cloth­ing com­pa­ny that was co-found­ed by child­hood friends Braden Cleary and Pre­ston Smith.

Grow­ing up, Cleary spent most of his time ski­ing or par­tic­i­pat­ing in the Boy Scouts, where he did his fair share of out­door activ­i­ties. His pas­sion for the out­doors is what sparked the idea for The­Mount­Co, a cloth­ing com­pa­ny ded­i­cat­ed to pro­mot­ing nature and the Nation­al Park Service.

The idea came to Cleary in high school after he and Smith decid­ed they want­ed to start a busi­ness togeth­er once they got into col­lege. Even though Cleary and Smith went to dif­fer­ent col­leges, Cleary going to Michi­gan State Uni­ver­si­ty and Smith going to Cap­i­tal Uni­ver­si­ty, they stuck to their goal and start­ed The­Mount­Co their fresh­man year of col­lege.  

Becom­ing a Brand

Once Cleary and Smith had the idea for the cloth­ing line, they need­ed a logo—something that would stand out, so peo­ple would rec­og­nize them.

First, they had the idea of a line of t‑shirts with sim­ple features—a man’s face, a thought bub­ble and the image of his favorite sport with­in the bub­ble. For exam­ple, one t‑shirt they designed depict­ed a man’s head with ski-relat­ed quotes, such as dif­fer­ent ski moun­tains, above it. So, Cleary and Smith hopped on the com­put­er to try and make this idea come alive, but when they start­ed to design it, they came up with The Beard­ed Man instead.

They start­ed small at first, most­ly sell­ing their prod­uct to their friends and fam­i­ly, but once their cloth­ing line picked up some steam, they added a web­site and beefed up their social media pres­ence. Soon enough, The Beard­ed Man could be spot­ted across the coun­try on their hats, t‑shirts, sweat­shirts and more.

The company’s most recent excit­ing ven­ture is becom­ing grass­roots part­ners with War­ren Miller Enter­tain­ment, the world’s biggest name in snow-sports cin­e­ma. Every year, War­ren Miller goes across the coun­try show­ing their lat­est films of dif­fer­ent snow-sports ath­letes doing what they love to do on ski moun­tains across the globe. The excite­ment the films gen­er­ate dri­ves adren­a­line-seek­ers in the audi­ence to actu­al­ly come and mar­vel at the beau­ti­ful, snow-filled land­scapes that act as the ath­letes’ play­ground. “I want­ed to come up with a col­lab­o­ra­tive project, thought of War­ren Miller films and was able to pro­mote at the biggest film­ing in Michi­gan,” Cleary says. By part­ner­ing with War­ren Miller Enter­tain­ment, Cleary was able to bring his cloth­ing line to the biggest show­ing in Michi­gan, in his col­lege town of East Lans­ing, and pro­mote it to fel­low ski bums.

Becom­ing a Co-Founder

So, how does the senior mar­ket­ing major keep up with his grow­ing busi­ness, school work and still be a part of the MSU Alpine Ski and Snow­board team? Cleary del­e­gates his time, some­thing he learned back in Boy Scouts. “That’s a key fac­tor for me to do all of it,” says the MSU senior.

And he doesn’t have any plan to stop soon. After grad­u­at­ing in the spring, Cleary plans to move to Trevor City, one of the biggest vaca­tion towns in the state, and open up shop there so he can focus on grow­ing the brand.

Child­hood friends and co-founders of The­Mount­Co, Braden Cleary and Pre­ston Smith. Pho­to cred­it: TheMountCo

In addi­tion, he also plans to improve the prod­ucts by plac­ing even more empha­sis on their per­for­mance fea­tures. “I want to be able to do more tech­ni­cal stuff. Right now we have hats, hood­ies and bean­ies, but I want to take that and make it out­door friend­ly.” In par­tic­u­lar, he is work­ing on cre­at­ing cloth­ing that has water-wick­ing capa­bil­i­ties, which is essen­tial for those long days ski­ing or snow­board­ing on the mountain.

More Than Clothing

The­Mount­Co isn’t just your reg­u­lar cloth­ing com­pa­ny for nature junkies; it’s a cloth­ing line based on the love and preser­va­tion of nature. And the com­pa­ny is try­ing to do just that by bring­ing aware­ness to a huge issue fac­ing our Nation­al Park Ser­vice that many peo­ple might be unaware of: the decline of vis­i­tors under the age of twen­ty-five. “It’s a hid­den issue where the demo­graph­ics aren’t favor­able to parks in the future,” says Cleary. “It’s most­ly seniors and fam­i­lies going, but not our age.”

Accord­ing to CNN’s Mor­gan Spur­lock, while nation­al parks have seen an increase in atten­dance, the num­ber of vis­i­tors under the age of fif­teen has decreased by half. Cleary and his team came across this issue last year while research­ing for their cam­paign to cel­e­brate the Nation­al Park Service’s cen­ten­ni­al year. Ide­al­ly, Cleary hopes that his com­pa­ny could act as the bridge between nation­al parks and millennials.

Cleary and his team are help­ing to bring aware­ness to this issue with their newest blog series, the Nation­al Park Project. The team sent out the real-life Beard­ed Man on a year-long jour­ney in a Mount­Co van across the Unit­ed States to vis­it all fifty-nine nation­al parks. The Beard­ed Man has been chron­i­cling his time at dif­fer­ent parks and speak­ing to dif­fer­ent park vis­i­tors, exec­u­tives and park work­ers to high­light the beau­ty and neces­si­ty of the nation­al park system.

We feel like peo­ple our age can find any­thing on their phone and they can see nation­al parks on their phones but it’s dif­fer­ent when you get out there,” says Cleary, and the Beard­ed Man project strives to pro­mote just that.

3 White Lies to Spin Your Resume to Land Your Dream Job

C’mon, just admit it, we’ve all done it. Just sprinkle some harmless white lies in your resume trying to impress the employer and score your dream job.

When apply­ing for a job or an intern­ship, you want to make your resume look pro­fes­sion­al and, most of all, impres­sive, so some­times you may fudge a few lines to fit the job you’re apply­ing for. Maybe you’re apply­ing for an intern­ship and they want a can­di­date who knows Microsoft Excel real­ly well and you wrote that as one of your skills (even though you prob­a­bly haven’t used Excel since your high school com­put­er class). Or maybe they want some­one with HTML knowl­edge and while you may have learned a lit­tle bit of it in col­lege, such as how to bold or ital­i­cize a word in code, you wrote it as a skill, too.

Every­one tells these lit­tle white lies in their resume to give them­selves an edge over oth­er appli­cants. How­ev­er, these tiny fibs aren’t nec­es­sar­i­ly a bad thing as long as they are not actu­al­ly lies. For exam­ple, if you’re apply­ing for a posi­tion that requires a cer­tain num­ber of years of expe­ri­ence in a par­tic­u­lar field, you wouldn’t put on your resume that you have that much expe­ri­ence. Instead, you would list the rel­e­vant expe­ri­ence you have for that job, but beef it up a lit­tle bit so it sounds as if you know what you’re doing.

Since your com­pe­ti­tion is going to be telling white lies to make them­selves look bet­ter, you’re going to need to as well. When it comes to skill­ful­ly elab­o­rat­ing on your abil­i­ties, make sure to play up your expe­ri­ence in these three ways.

1. Write down skills you can eas­i­ly learn.

As I men­tioned, while you may not know a lot about a cer­tain soft­ware pro­gram, such as Excel, you prob­a­bly have the basic knowl­edge to get your foot in the door with a com­pa­ny. Then, while you work there, you can gain more expe­ri­ence with it, learn more about it and become an Excel pro in no time. Peo­ple always say you learn bet­ter on the job than in a class­room and that’s exact­ly cor­rect. You can learn a lot of the­o­ries in a class­room or from a book, but until you have the oppor­tu­ni­ty to prac­tice a task in real life, you’ll nev­er be able to ful­ly grasp it.

Now, you shouldn’t lie about a skill if you can’t quick­ly learn more about it or you don’t have the basic knowl­edge. A good rule of thumb for this is if you can learn what you need to learn for the job in a night, you can include it in your resume. If you can’t and it’s more com­pli­cat­ed and dif­fi­cult to learn, don’t write it.

2. Spin expe­ri­ence when it’s relevant.

Spin­ning doesn’t mean lying, but rather dig­ging into what expe­ri­ence you already have and empha­siz­ing its rel­e­vance to the posi­tion you’re apply­ing for. For exam­ple, if you’re apply­ing for a job as a free­lance writer, but don’t have a degree in jour­nal­ism or Eng­lish, you could write about how you wrote arti­cles for your school news­pa­per, pieces for an online pub­li­ca­tion or even the newslet­ter for a club you were in. By doing those jobs, you gained rel­e­vant expe­ri­ence, so go ahead and put free­lance writ­ing on your resume to stand out.

Or, maybe you’re at a job where you do cus­tomer ser­vice, but you even­tu­al­ly want to work in mar­ket­ing or admin­is­tra­tion. If you want a dif­fer­ent job, you can find aspects of your cur­rent posi­tion that per­tain to the job you want. For exam­ple, you’re a cus­tomer ser­vice rep­re­sen­ta­tive, but you want to even­tu­al­ly go into mar­ket­ing. See if there is any small mar­ket­ing skill you can do at your com­pa­ny, such as help­ing with their social media accounts. If you want your dream career, you have to be able to spin the expe­ri­ence you have into the expe­ri­ence that will land you that job.

3. Only put skills on your resume that describe you, not the job.

Does the posi­tion you’re apply­ing for call for some­one who is out­go­ing, per­son­able and moti­vat­ed? Those are three com­mon qual­i­ties employ­ers look for in a poten­tial employ­ee. Maybe you fit two out of those three per­son­al­i­ty traits, but not the last one. When this hap­pens, you can swap out the per­son­al­i­ty trait that doesn’t describe you and with one that does. When it comes time to choose the sub­sti­tute trait, make sure to list one that both describes you and sets you apart from the crowd of applicants.

Maybe you’re not out­go­ing or all that per­son­able, but you are detail-ori­en­tat­ed and have lead­er­ship capa­bil­i­ties. Those are still two qual­i­ties that employ­ers want to see in an employ­ee, so don’t be shy and use those skills to your advan­tage. Most peo­ple would just put down the skills and per­son­al­i­ty traits that are straight from the job descrip­tion, but very few employ­ers want some­one who fol­lows the herd.

7 Things Every College Student Needs in Their First Apartment

This list is to make sure you don’t suffer from the nightmare of preparing to move from your dorm room to your new apartment.

Well, you did it. You found that dream apart­ment. You final­ly moved out of that small, rinky-dink col­lege dorm room equipped with a twen­ty-year-old twin-size bed that smelled like feet, a few inch­es sep­a­rat­ing you and your room­mate and an old rick­ety desk that you nev­er used.

Now, you moved up in the world and are try­ing to be a real adult with your first col­lege apart­ment. Per­haps you’re mov­ing to an apart­ment pro­vid­ed by your col­lege or uni­ver­si­ty, or you some­how con­vinced your par­ents to co-sign a lease for you in an off-cam­pus apart­ment that is a lit­tle nicer than the col­lege-owned property.

Regard­less, you are now becom­ing a real-life adult with a real-life apart­ment with, most like­ly, your own room, kitchen and bath­room instead of the com­mu­nal ones that you shared with an entire floor of co-eds. Even though you prob­a­bly have room­mates, shar­ing an apart­ment with three or four oth­er peo­ple is def­i­nite­ly more ide­al than shar­ing a dorm room with them.

You’re prob­a­bly super excit­ed right now as you and your room­mates are try­ing to map out exact­ly what you need for your new pad to make it your new home for the next year or two. To be hon­est, you’re prob­a­bly sur­prised at how much stuff you will actu­al­ly need in your new apart­ment, much of which you didn’t even think you need­ed until now, such as a can or wine open­er. Yes, sim­ple things like that get over­looked all the time when col­lege stu­dents are mov­ing from a dorm room to an apart­ment because you’ve nev­er had to wor­ry about bring­ing small house­hold items. All you’ve had to wor­ry about so far is bring­ing bed­ding, bed ris­ers that you most like­ly didn’t use, toi­letries, cloth­ing, a microwave if you’re the room­mate that got stuck with that task and a mini-fridge to house all of your cheap alcohol.

Being in an apart­ment is very dif­fer­ent from liv­ing in uni­ver­si­ty hous­ing and you will need a pletho­ra of things for your new home. But don’t wor­ry, this arti­cle has got you cov­ered. Here are the 7 things every col­lege stu­dent needs for their new apartment.

1. Wine opener

You will need this lit­tle guy before you can enjoy your much need­ed glass of wine. Pho­to cred­it: Bar Product

As pre­vi­ous­ly stat­ed in this arti­cle, a wine open­er is a cru­cial yet fre­quent­ly over­looked neces­si­ty for every col­lege apart­ment. By the time you have moved into an apart­ment, you would have been most like­ly old enough to legal­ly drink, so instead of drink­ing cheap liquor, you will resort to drink­ing cheap wine. You will be sur­prised at how many times you will actu­al­ly need a wine open­er. Whether you are try­ing to cook a nice pas­ta din­ner for your room­mates with red wine or enjoy­ing a glass or two of white wine while hang­ing out with friends, you will def­i­nite­ly be hap­py that you brought one.

2. Inspi­ra­tional posters

Every­one in a col­lege dorm room hangs posters up on their wall; they’re most like­ly posters from their favorite movie, actor or sports team. How­ev­er, when you move into an apart­ment, you prob­a­bly want to upgrade those posters to reflect your upgrad­ed liv­ing arrange­ment. Inspi­ra­tional posters or wall decals will make you feel like a cham­pi­on upper­class­man. These posters will help you stay sane dur­ing finals week as well because, let’s be hon­est, you will need a pep talk before you take on that full week of exams and papers.

3. Cof­fee maker

You will soon real­ize what a life saver this machine is. Pho­to cred­it: Williams Sonoma

Hav­ing a cof­fee mak­er at your apart­ment will be a life saver. When you lived on cam­pus, your din­ing hall prob­a­bly had free cof­fee that you could drink when­ev­er you want­ed. How­ev­er, now that you’re liv­ing in an apart­ment, you’ll need to make your own. Whether you need a jolt of caf­feine for your 8 a.m. class, a mid-after­noon pick-me-up or some­thing to help you pull an all-nighter, you will be glad that you have that cof­fee mak­er to help you. You’ll also save a lot of mon­ey by mak­ing your own cof­fee instead of spend­ing around $5 or $6 on your favorite Star­bucks or Dunkin’ Donuts drink every day.

4. Clean­ing supplies

Any clean­ing sup­plies, espe­cial­ly mul­ti­pur­pose wipes, are essen­tial for any home, espe­cial­ly a col­lege apart­ment. Mul­ti­pur­pose wipes are great for an easy and quick clean up when you are in a hur­ry or when you’re feel­ing lazy. Oth­er sim­ple clean­ing sup­plies such as a broom and vac­u­um will also become your most handy clean­ing tools because they allow for a quick cleanup before and after that row­dy night with your friends.

5. Stor­age

Just like when you moved into a dorm, you will need a lot of stor­age for your first apart­ment. Most first apart­ments for col­lege stu­dents are small and cramped, which is why they are so afford­able for those on a strict bud­get, so you are going to want a lot of stor­age space to keep all of your belong­ings. Bring along that under-the-bed stor­age from your dorm room and any stor­age bins you had as well. You will need to store things that you nev­er thought you would have to, such as dif­fer­ent clothes for the chang­ing sea­sons, pots and pans that don’t fit in your kitchen, extra bed­ding and any oth­er excess stuff that you and your room­mates brought mul­ti­ple sets of.

6. Dry erase board

Com­mu­ni­ca­tion has nev­er been eas­i­er with the help of a dry erase board. Pho­to cred­it: SDC

Dry erase boards will become your best friend in your apart­ment. You and your room­mates can use them for basi­cal­ly any­thing such as gro­cery lists, a cal­en­dar of upcom­ing events to keep track of everyone’s hec­tic sched­ules, a chore list for every­one in the apart­ment to make sure they are doing their part to help keep the apart­ment nice and tidy, and even lit­tle reminder notes to remind your­selves of any upcom­ing home­work, projects or the dread­ed par­ents visits.

7. Tool kit

A tool kit will be your sav­ing grace when­ev­er any­thing breaks in your new apart­ment, and things will break at one point or anoth­er. Whether you have a leaky faucet, a bro­ken chair leg or just some inspi­ra­tional posters that need to be hung, you will need a tool kit for most­ly any­thing. You want to be pre­pared for basi­cal­ly any­thing that goes wrong in your apart­ment so you don’t have to rely on your land­lord all of the time.

6 Essential Items Every College Student Needs on Their Holiday Wish List

Is your wish list ready for the gifting season?

Well, it’s offi­cial­ly the hol­i­day sea­son with Pep­per­mint Mocha Lat­te offered in every café, hol­i­day dec­o­ra­tions in every store and, even though we haven’t even made it through Thanks­giv­ing yet, hol­i­day music play­ing soft­ly in your favorite cof­fee shop.

This is also around the time that col­lege stu­dents are metic­u­lous­ly count­ing down the days until finals are over and they can final­ly go home and get some seri­ous rest, have a home-cooked meal, sleep in a bed that doesn’t feel like rocks, see their friends from high school and more impor­tant­ly, give and receive some gifts.

The hol­i­days are a time for giv­ing and col­lege stu­dents love this sea­son more than any­one else because, well, they’re broke. When you’re younger, you can’t wait for the hol­i­days because you get time off of school to be with your loved ones, eat a great hol­i­day meal of your family’s choos­ing and get lots and lots of gifts. It’s the same when you’re in col­lege, but the dif­fer­ence is that every col­lege stu­dent is too broke to buy them­selves any­thing, so the hol­i­days turn into a time to get all of the neces­si­ties (with­out actu­al­ly pay­ing for them).

Need some new clothes that haven’t been stained by a beer show­er from a frat par­ty? Put it in on your wish list. Need a new lap­top after you spilled some ramen on yours? Wish list. Need some extra snacks to stash in your clos­et after devour­ing all of your sup­plies a week into school? Def­i­nite­ly put Pud­ding Snacks and Gold­fish on your wish list.

You prob­a­bly have already thought through your wish list for the hol­i­day sea­son, but if you haven’t and your par­ents are pres­sur­ing you to write it all down or you just want some more ideas, here are six essen­tial items that every col­lege stu­dent needs on their wish list this hol­i­day season.

1. A gift card to your favorite cof­fee shop

Gift cards are prac­ti­cal and versatile–the per­fect gift for col­lege stu­dents. Pho­to cred­it: CNET

I’m sure the cof­fee that they have at your schools din­ing hall is pret­ty good, maybe a sol­id four on a scale of one to ten? But let’s be hon­est, you are always crav­ing your favorite lat­te, mac­chi­a­to or spe­cial iced cof­fee that Dunkin Donuts or Star­bucks makes. A gift card is always a prac­ti­cal item on any wish list and a card to your favorite cof­fee shop will come in handy when you need a pick-me-up dur­ing those long nights study­ing in the library.

2. A heavy-duty case for all of your tech gadgets

Every­body nowa­days has a case for all of their tech gad­gets; they would be basi­cal­ly naked with­out them. How­ev­er, when you’re in col­lege, you need a case that can with­stand a lot of dam­age. Let’s say while you’re try­ing to take a cute self­ie at a par­ty, some­one drunk­en­ly bumps into you and your phone drops. Or, you fall asleep after watch­ing Net­flix until  2 a.m. and your lap­top falls off your bed. Any­thing can hap­pen at col­lege and you have to pre­pare your expen­sive tech gad­gets. A good case that is going to last through all of the unex­pect­ed things that hap­pen in col­lege is def­i­nite­ly a necessity.

3. Mon­ey for textbooks

You can always use some help with the text­book cost. Pho­to cred­it: 99.9 KEKB

It’s no secret that text­books can get very expen­sive. Nobody knows exact­ly why it costs around $100 for a biol­o­gy text­book that you’ll use for one semes­ter, but you’re going to need that over­priced book. So, hav­ing some extra cash to help pay for your books next semes­ter will help a lot. Or, you can opt to ask for a gift card to your school’s book­store that you can use on books or any oth­er school sup­plies that you may need.

4. New shoes

You might not think putting new shoes on your wish list is a must, but it is. When you went back-to-school shop­ping, you prob­a­bly already bought some new shoes to go along with that new top or pair of pants. But over the semes­ter, they have prob­a­bly seen some hor­rif­ic scenes and have got­ten beat­en up pret­ty bad­ly. From the dirty, mud filled tail­gates to the rainy days on cam­pus when you’ve had to run to shel­ter, they have seen some ups and down, and they’ve prob­a­bly even had a few alco­holic bev­er­ages spilled on them at a par­ty. If any of these things have hap­pened to your shoes, you prob­a­bly need a new pair or two depend­ing on how rough your semes­ter was, so you are def­i­nite­ly going to want to put new shoes on your wish list.

5. Noise-can­celling headphones

Noise-can­celling head­phones are a neces­si­ty in col­lege where you rarely have a moment of com­plete silence either to study or just to get lost in your own head. With noise-can­celling head­phones, you can lis­ten to music and drown out the noise around you. You can just put them on while study­ing or writ­ing a paper so that you can real­ly focus on your work. They are per­fect in the gym, the library or your dorm room when your room­mate has friends over.

6. Polaroid camera

A polaroid cam­era will per­fect­ly cap­ture your beloved col­lege mem­o­ries. Pho­to cred­it: Dark­room and Dearly

In col­lege, you will make some pret­ty incred­i­ble mem­o­ries, so you’re going to need a cam­era that cap­tures those moments. While you can use your smart phone to take pic­tures, they will most like­ly just stay on your phone until you run out of stor­age and have to delete some. A polaroid cam­era is a lit­tle vin­tage, but you can print your pho­tos instant­ly and hang them in your dorm room for dec­o­ra­tion. Plus, polaroid cam­eras already have a fil­ter, so you can save time with edit­ing your photos.