How Bump Stocks Are Changing The Gun Control Debate

Bump stocks are more crucial to this debate than you may think.

On Sun­day night, Octo­ber 1 at the Route 91 Har­vest music fes­ti­val in Las Vegas, Stephen Pad­dock opened fire and shot hun­dreds of rounds into the crowd from his hotel room at the Man­dalay Bay hotel. While the shoot­ing only last­ed about ten min­utes, he man­aged to kill fifty-eight peo­ple and injured hun­dreds more.

When police had burst into his hotel suite, they found him dead and with an arse­nal of twen­ty-three guns. At least a dozen of those guns had bump stocks that allowed Pad­dock to shoot close to a hun­dred rounds in the mat­ter of a few seconds.

Still, nobody knows exact­ly why Pad­dock opened fire onto the crowd that was just there to have fun. This shoot­ing, along with all of the oth­er sense­less mass shoot­ings that have occurred over the past few years, has reignit­ed the gun-con­trol debate.

Accord­ing to the Gun Vio­lence Archive, a non-prof­it orga­ni­za­tion that pro­vides online pub­lic access to gun-relat­ed infor­ma­tion in the Unit­ed States, there have been two hun­dred and eighty mass shoot­ings in the coun­try in 2017 alone, yet we only hear about the dead­liest ones. It took the dead­liest mass shoot­ing in our coun­try and the use of bump stocks to spark some hope for stricter gun con­trol laws.

So, what are bump stocks?

Bump stocks are pieces of plas­tic or met­al that are mold­ed into the part of the gun that is rest­ed on the shoul­der. Once put one on a rifle, it frees the weapon to slide back and forth quick­ly by har­ness­ing the ener­gy from the gun’s nat­ur­al recoil. After the shoot­er pulls the trig­ger, the stock bumps back and forth between the shooter’s shoul­der and trig­ger fin­ger allow­ing the gun to quick­ly fire. This enables the shoot­er to shoot large amounts of rounds with­in sec­onds. It basi­cal­ly turns a reg­u­lar rifle or semi-auto­mat­ic gun into an auto­mat­ic weapon. The main dif­fer­ence though? Reg­u­lar auto­mat­ic guns are ille­gal for pri­vate cit­i­zens to own, but bump stocks are not ille­gal under fed­er­al law.

Why are bump stocks not illegal?

You might be think­ing, well, if this piece of plas­tic turns a reg­u­lar gun into a full-blown, dan­ger­ous auto­mat­ic weapon, why isn’t it ille­gal? Bump stocks were first intro­duced in 2010 and were sold for a few hun­dred dol­lars, which is pret­ty cheap con­sid­er­ing the dam­age they can cause. How­ev­er, they aren’t ille­gal because they don’t actu­al­ly mod­i­fy the weapon’s mechan­i­cal com­po­nents. This is where the debate around bump stocks is formed. Many peo­ple believe that bump stocks should be ille­gal because they turn reg­u­lar guns into dan­ger­ous auto­mat­ic weapons.

The true pow­er of the bump stock

The New York Times recent­ly wrote an arti­cle that com­pared the semi­au­to­mat­ic assault rifle used at the 2016 Pulse night­club shoot­ing in Orlan­do, one of Stephen Paddock’s guns with the bump stock and a reg­u­lar auto­mat­ic weapon. They took the audio of the gun­shots used from each gun and when you lis­ten to each indi­vid­ual weapon, there is a strik­ing famil­iar­i­ty between the gun used in the Las Vegas shoot­ing and an actu­al auto­mat­ic weapon.

The gun used in the Orlan­do shoot­ing fired twen­ty-four shots in nine sec­onds while the gun used in Las Vegas shot nine­ty shots in ten sec­onds and the auto­mat­ic weapon fired nine­ty-eight shots in sev­en sec­onds. While twen­ty-four shots in nine sec­onds is scary in itself, the fact that the gun used in Neva­da shot nine­ty shots for one sec­ond longer, is even worse.

These pieces of plas­tic are chang­ing the gun con­trol debate
On Octo­ber 4, Sen. Dianne Fein­stein, a long­time advo­cate for stricter gun con­trol laws, intro­duced a bill that would ban the sale and pos­ses­sion of bump-stock equip­ment and any oth­er pieces of equip­ment that can turn a semi­au­to­mat­ic weapon into an auto­mat­ic one.

The bill states that, “it shall be unlaw­ful for any per­son to import, sell, man­u­fac­ture, trans­fer or pos­sess, in or affect­ing inter­state or for­eign com­merce, a trig­ger crank, a bump-fire device or any part, com­bi­na­tion of parts, com­po­nent, device, attach­ment or acces­so­ry that is designed or func­tions to accel­er­ate the rate of fire of a semi­au­to­mat­ic rifle but not con­vert the semi­au­to­mat­ic rifle into a machine gun.”

This bill, the Auto­mat­ic Gun­fire Pre­ven­tion Act, is pur­pose­ly broad, so it would not only ban bump stocks but any acces­so­ry that would turn a semi­au­to­mat­ic weapon into an auto­mat­ic one.

And just last week, the Nation­al Rifle Asso­ci­a­tion and the Repub­li­can par­ty pub­li­cal­ly stat­ed that there should be stricter laws for bump stocks. Yes, the NRA and Repub­li­cans who are usu­al­ly against the Demo­c­ra­t­ic par­ty on the gun con­trol issue and fight for few­er gun restric­tions, think that there should be a ban on bump stocks. Even after the mass shoot­ing at Sandy Hook Ele­men­tary School in New­town, Conn., Repub­li­can lead­ers shot down bipar­ti­san leg­is­la­tion to have stricter back­ground checks for peo­ple try­ing to pur­chase a gun.

On Octo­ber 4, Repub­li­cans said that they would be open to ban­ning bump stocks. Repub­li­can Sen­a­tor John Cornyn, an avid hunter from Texas, even stat­ed, “’It seems like it’s an obvi­ous area we ought to explore and see if it’s some­thing Con­gress needs to act on.’”

The fol­low­ing day, the NRA, the country’s biggest gun-rights group, fol­lowed suit and announced they were join­ing the effort. They stat­ed, “’The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semi-auto­mat­ic rifles to func­tion like ful­ly-auto­mat­ed rifles should be sub­ject to addi­tion­al regulations.’”

How­ev­er, there are still some Repub­li­cans who believe that gun con­trol should not be a thing at all. Like Repub­li­can Sen­a­tor Richard Shel­by telling CNN, “I’m a Sec­ond Amend­ment man. I’m not for any gun con­trol. None.”

Despite some politi­cians still oppos­ing gun con­trol, the fact that oth­er Repub­li­cans believe that bump stocks should be banned is a huge step for­ward for the gun con­trol debate and for both sides see­ing eye-to-eye on this issue.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *